| Literature DB >> 18227919 |
Kerstin Khattab1, Ahmed A Khattab, Jasmin Ortak, Gert Richardt, Hendrik Bonnemeier.
Abstract
Relaxation techniques are established in managing of cardiac patients during rehabilitation aiming to reduce future adverse cardiac events. It has been hypothesized that relaxation-training programs may significantly improve cardiac autonomic nervous tone. However, this has not been proven for all available relaxation techniques. We tested this assumption by investigating cardiac vagal modulation during yoga.We examined 11 healthy yoga practitioners (7 women and 4 men, mean age: 43 +/- 11; range: 26-58 years). Each individual was subjected to training units of 90 min once a week over five successive weeks. During two sessions, they practiced a yoga program developed for cardiac patients by B.K.S. Iyengar. On three sessions, they practiced a placebo program of relaxation. On each training day they underwent ambulatory 24 h Holter monitoring. The group of yoga practitioners was compared to a matched group of healthy individuals not practicing any relaxation techniques. Parameters of heart rate variability (HRV) were determined hourly by a blinded observer. Mean RR interval (interval between two R-waves of the ECG) was significantly higher during the time of yoga intervention compared to placebo and to control (P < 0.001 for both). The increase in HRV parameters was significantly higher during yoga exercise than during placebo and control especially for the parameters associated with vagal tone, i.e. mean standard deviation of NN (Normal Beat to Normal Beat of the ECG) intervals for all 5-min intervals (SDNNi, P < 0.001 for both) and root mean square successive difference (rMSSD, P < 0.01 for both). In conclusion, relaxation by yoga training is associated with a significant increase of cardiac vagal modulation. Since this method is easy to apply with no side effects, it could be a suitable intervention in cardiac rehabilitation programs.Entities:
Keywords: Iyengar Yoga; cardiac rehabilitation; heart-rate-variability; yoga
Year: 2007 PMID: 18227919 PMCID: PMC2176143 DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nem087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Sequence of asanas (yoga-postures) performed by 11 yoga students during time of intervention
| Shavasana with support (corpse pose, see |
| Supta Baddha Konasana with support (supine, bound angle pose) |
| Purvottanasana on bench and support (intense stretch of the front of the body, see |
| Trikonasana with a trestle (triangular standing pose) |
| Parshvakonasana with a trestle (lateral angle standing pose) |
| Ardha Chandrasana with a trestle (half moon standing pose, see |
| Prasarita Pardottasasana, concave back (spread legs, intensely streched) |
| Bharadvajasana, sitting on chair, hands on trestle (twisting pose named after Bharadvaja) |
| Adho Mukha Shvanasana with ropes (downward facing dog pose) |
| Shirshasana (headstand) |
| Viparita Dandasana with bench (inverted stick pose) |
| Dhanurasana with or without support (upward bow pose, see |
| Sarvangasana with chair (shoulderstand) |
| Halasana with support (plough pose) |
| Bhismacharyasana with support (backbend named after Bhisma, see |
| Setubandha Sarvangasana with support (bridge pose) |
| Viparita Karani on Setubandha Bench (inverted lake pose) |
| Shavasana with support (corpse pose, see |
Figure 1.(a) Shavasana/corpse pose. (b) Purvottanasana on bench and support/intense stretch of the front of the body. (c) Ardha Chandrasana with a trestle/half moon standing pose. (d) Urdhva Dhanurasana with support/upward bow pose. (e) Bhismacharyasana with support/backbend named after Bhisma.
Baseline criteria of healthy yoga practitioners subjected to yoga or placebo and their matched healthy controls
| Yoga practitioners ( | (Controls | |
|---|---|---|
| Male (%) | 36.4 | 36.4 |
| Age range (years) | 26–58 | 26–57 |
| Smoker, hypertension, diabetes, history of cardiovascular disease (%) | 0 | 0 |
Figure 2.(a) Mean hourly results of RR-interval ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). ***Yoga versus Placebo P < 0.001, **Yoga versus Control P < 0.01. (b) Mean hourly results of SDNN ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the Yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). ***Yoga versus Control P < 0.001, ***Placebo versus Control P < 0.001. (c) Mean hourly results of SDNNi ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the Yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). ***Yoga versus Placebo P < 0.001, ***Yoga versus Control P < 0.001. *Placebo versus Control P < 0.05. (d) Mean hourly results of SNN50 ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the Yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). **Yoga versus Placebo P < 0.01, **Yoga versus Control P < 0.01. (e) Mean hourly results of SDANN ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the Yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). **Yoga versus Placebo P < 0.01, ***Yoga versus Control P < 0.001, ***Placebo versus Control P < 0.001. (f) Mean hourly results of rMSSD ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the Yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). **Yoga versus. Placebo P < 0.01, **Yoga versus Control P < 0.01, *Placebo versus Control P < 0.05. (g) Mean hourly results of TI ECG-recordings among 11 Yoga students and a matched control group. The red arrow marks time of intervention of the Yoga group (Yoga or Placebo). ***Yoga versus Placebo P < 0.001, ***Yoga versus Control P < 0.001, *Placebo versus Control P < 0.0.
Results during time of intervention
| Yoga mean ± SD | Placebo mean ± SD | Control mean ± SD | Significance yoga versus placebo | Significance yoga versus control | Significance placebo versus control | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR Interval | 864.5 ± 119 | 746.4 ± 86 | 743.6 ± 115 | n.s. | ||
| SDNN | 129.6 ± 22 | 130.7 ± 32 | 78.7 ± 26 | n.s. | ||
| SDNNi | 86.9 ± 16 | 62.9 ± 29 | 53.9 ± 18 | |||
| SNN50 | 580.3 ± 410 | 408.7 ± 371 | 246.1 ± 300 | n.s. | ||
| SDANN | 90.8 ± 32 | 116.6 ± 33.5 | 49.7 ± 25.9 | |||
| rMSSD | 37.3 ± 10 | 30.1 ± 9 | 24.1 ± 12 | |||
| TI | 26.5 ± 6 | 24.6 ± 8 | 17.6 ± 6 |