OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at the comparison between an individual and a group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Parallel series, prospective, 3-year study. A group program of 10 weekly sessions focused on lifestyle modification was compared with a similar, individual 10-session program. Fifty-seven patients were assigned to individual treatment, and 84 patients to the group program. SUBJECTS:One hundred- forty-one obese female outpatients without binge eating disorder, aged 42.0+/-11.6 years (m+/-SD), with Body Mass Index (BMI) 37.3+/-5.2 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: BMI and waist circumference were measured at 0, 6, 12 and 36 months. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS:Mean weight loss was superior with the group program at 6 months (2.0+/-3.9 vs 0.8+/-2.5 kg/m(2); p<0.05), while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 12 and 36 months. Mean waist circumference was significantly different at 6 months (group 97.4+/-2.5 vs individual 102.9+/-2.4, p<0.05), still remaining superior in the patients following individual treatment (100.2+/-5.0 vs 103.7+/-5.9) at 12 months, while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 36 months. The proportion of patients losing more than 5% of initial body weight with the group program (16.6, 15.5, and 38.1% at 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively) was not significantly different from that observed with individual treatment (5.3, 14.0, and 35.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity is not inferior to a similar program applied in individual setting, and it may enhance weight loss (especially fat mass, according to the waist measurement) in the short term.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at the comparison between an individual and a group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity. DESIGN: Parallel series, prospective, 3-year study. A group program of 10 weekly sessions focused on lifestyle modification was compared with a similar, individual 10-session program. Fifty-seven patients were assigned to individual treatment, and 84 patients to the group program. SUBJECTS: One hundred- forty-one obese female outpatients without binge eating disorder, aged 42.0+/-11.6 years (m+/-SD), with Body Mass Index (BMI) 37.3+/-5.2 kg/m(2). MEASUREMENTS: BMI and waist circumference were measured at 0, 6, 12 and 36 months. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was superior with the group program at 6 months (2.0+/-3.9 vs 0.8+/-2.5 kg/m(2); p<0.05), while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 12 and 36 months. Mean waist circumference was significantly different at 6 months (group 97.4+/-2.5 vs individual 102.9+/-2.4, p<0.05), still remaining superior in the patients following individual treatment (100.2+/-5.0 vs 103.7+/-5.9) at 12 months, while no difference between the two treatments was observed at 36 months. The proportion of patients losing more than 5% of initial body weight with the group program (16.6, 15.5, and 38.1% at 6, 12, and 36 months, respectively) was not significantly different from that observed with individual treatment (5.3, 14.0, and 35.0%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A group cognitive-behavioral program for the treatment of obesity is not inferior to a similar program applied in individual setting, and it may enhance weight loss (especially fat mass, according to the waist measurement) in the short term.
Authors: G Marchesini; S Natale; S Chierici; R Manini; L Besteghi; S Di Domizio; A Sartini; F Pasqui; L Baraldi; G Forlani; N Melchionda Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord Date: 2002-09
Authors: Kate Lambourne; Richard A Washburn; Cheryl Gibson; Debra K Sullivan; Jeannine Goetz; Robert Lee; Bryan K Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: B Cresci; G Castellini; L Pala; C Ravaldi; C Faravelli; C M Rotella; V Ricca Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: L Busetto; M Mazza; S Salvalaio; F De Stefano; M Marangon; E Calò; S Sampietro; G Enzi Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2009 Jun-Sep Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Lauren T Ptomey; Anna M Gorczyca; Patricia R Smith; Matthew S Mayo; Robert Lee; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Anna M Gorczyca; Richard A Washburn; Lauren Ptomey; Matthew S Mayo; Debra K Sullivan; Cheryl A Gibson; Robert Lee; Sarah Stolte; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Ruth S Weinstock; Paula M Trief; Donald Cibula; Philip C Morin; Linda M Delahanty Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nancy E Sherwood; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman; Daniel Almirall; Elisabeth M Seburg; A Lauren Crain; Alicia S Kunin-Batson; Marcia G Hayes; Rona L Levy; Robert W Jeffery Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 2.226