Literature DB >> 18226886

Tooth reorientation affects tooth function during prey processing and tooth ontogeny in the lesser electric ray, Narcine brasiliensis.

Mason N Dean1, Jason B Ramsay, Justin T Schaefer.   

Abstract

The dental anatomy of elasmobranch fishes (sharks, rays and relatives) creates a functional system that is more dynamic than that of mammalian dentition. Continuous dental replacement (where new teeth are moved rostrally to replace older ones) and indirect fibrous attachment of the dentition to the jaw allow teeth to reorient relative to the jaw over both long- and short-term scales, respectively. In this study, we examine the processing behavior and dental anatomy of the lesser electric ray Narcine brasiliensis (Olfers, 1831) to illustrate that the freedom of movement of elasmobranch dentition allows a functional flexibility that can be important for complex prey processing behaviors. From static manipulations of dissected jaws and observations of feeding events in live animals, we show that the teeth rotate during jaw protrusion, resulting in a secondary grasping mechanism that likely serves to hold prey while the buccal cavity is flushed free of sediment. The function of teeth is not always readily apparent from morphology; in addition to short-term reorientation, the long-term dental reorientation during replacement allows a given tooth to serve multiple functions during tooth ontogeny. Unlike teeth inside the mouth, the cusps of external teeth (on the portion of the tooth pad that extends past the occlusal plane) lay flat, such that the labial faces act as a functional battering surface, protecting the jaws during prey excavation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18226886     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Always chew your food: freshwater stingrays use mastication to process tough insect prey.

Authors:  Matthew A Kolmann; Kenneth C Welch; Adam P Summers; Nathan R Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Shape-preserving erosion controlled by the graded microarchitecture of shark tooth enameloid.

Authors:  Shahrouz Amini; Hajar Razi; Ronald Seidel; Daniel Werner; William T White; James C Weaver; Mason N Dean; Peter Fratzl
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  A new cuspidate ptychodontid shark (Chondrichthyes; Elasmobranchii), from the Upper Cretaceous of Morocco with comments on tooth functionalities and replacement patterns.

Authors:  Manuel Amadori; René Kindlimann; Eliana Fornaciari; Luca Giusberti; Jürgen Kriwet
Journal:  J Afr Earth Sci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Biomechanical insights into the dentition of megatooth sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae).

Authors:  Antonio Ballell; Humberto G Ferrón
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Large batoid fishes frequently consume stingrays despite skeletal damage.

Authors:  Mason N Dean; Joseph J Bizzarro; Brett Clark; Charlie J Underwood; Zerina Johanson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.