Literature DB >> 18226698

En bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery (with video).

Mainor R Antillon1, Christopher R Bartalos, Marc L Miller, Alberto A Diaz-Arias, Jamal A Ibdah, John B Marshall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was recently developed in Japan for en bloc removal of laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). Although initially used for gastric tumors, ESD has now been applied to lesions elsewhere in the gut. Recent reports from Japan included removal of colorectal lesions up to 10 cm.
OBJECTIVE: To show the feasibility of ESD to remove en bloc, very large LSTs of the rectum, even when there is involvement to the dentate line.
DESIGN: Case report.
SETTING: The procedure was performed at an American GI unit. The patient was admitted to the hospital after the procedure for observation. PATIENTS: A 53-year-old patient, with a 14-cm tubulovillous adenoma of the rectum, which, at its maximal extent, involved two thirds of the circumference of the rectum. The tumor extended distally to the dentate line.
INTERVENTIONS: En bloc submucosal dissection with a conventional needle-knife to remove the neoplasm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Completeness of en bloc removal of the tumor and subsequent follow-up endoscopy that showed no residual neoplasm.
RESULTS: The tumor was able to be removed en bloc by ESD. The distal margin included squamous mucosa. At a 2.5-week endoscopic follow-up, a 3-mm focus of residual polyp was seen and removed. At the time of the last follow-up, there was complete healing of the wound and no residual neoplasm. LIMITATIONS: Single case.
CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrated the feasibility of using ESD to remove large laterally spreading rectal tumors, including when there was involvement to the dentate line (and the dissection line must include squamous mucosa of the anal canal). ESD is a promising alternative to conventional surgical techniques; however, additional published experience is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18226698     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Shiro Oka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors extending to the dentate line.

Authors:  Satohiro Matsumoto; Hirosato Mashima
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus local excision for early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Wang; S Gao; W Yang; S Guo; Y Li
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Complex colon polypectomy.

Authors:  Juan F Gallegos-Orozco; Suryakanth R Gurudu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-06

5.  Balloon overtube-guided colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Tomohiko Ohya; Ken Ohata; Kazuki Sumiyama; Yousuke Tsuji; Ikuro Koba; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for anorectal tumor with hemorrhoids close to the dentate line: a multicenter study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Study Group.

Authors:  Yuzuru Tamaru; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yuko Hiraga; Masaki Kunihiro; Shinji Nagata; Akira Furudoi; Yuki Ninomiya; Naoki Asayama; Kenjiro Shigita; Soki Nishiyama; Nana Hayashi; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading tumors involving the appendiceal orifice.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tashima; Ken Ohata; Kouichi Nonaka; Eiji Sakai; Yohei Minato; Hajime Horiuchi; Nobuyuki Matsuhashi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.

Authors:  Yutaka Saito; Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Takahisa Matsuda; Shusei Fukunaga; Taku Sakamoto; Toshio Uraoka; Takeshi Nakajima; Hisatomo Ikehara; Kuang-I Fu; Takao Itoi; Takahiro Fujii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Can endoscopic ultrasound predict early rectal cancers that can be resected endoscopically? A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Matthew L Bechtold; Jyotsna B K Reddy; Abhishek Choudhary; Mainor R Antillon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Stenosis rates after endoscopic submucosal dissection of large rectal tumors involving greater than three quarters of the luminal circumference.

Authors:  Seiichiro Abe; Taku Sakamoto; Hiroyuki Takamaru; Masayoshi Yamada; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.