Literature DB >> 18226650

Outcomes after a prone lumbar traction protocol for patients with activity-limiting low back pain: a prospective case series study.

Paul F Beattie1, Roger M Nelson, Lori A Michener, Joseph Cammarata, Jonathan Donley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine outcomes after administration of a prone lumbar traction protocol.
DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, case series.
SETTING: Suburban, chiropractic practice. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 296 subjects with low back pain (LBP) and evidence of a degenerative and/or herniated intervertebral disk at 1 or more levels of the lumbar spine. We excluded patients involved in litigation and those receiving workers' compensation. INTERVENTION: An 8-week course of prone lumbar traction, using the vertebral axial decompression (VAX-D) system, consisting of five 30-minute sessions a week for 4 weeks, followed by one 30-minute session a week for 4 additional weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The numeric pain rating scale and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) were completed at preintervention, discharge (within 2 weeks of the last visit), and at 30 days and 180 days after discharge. Intention-to-treat strategies were used to account for those subjects lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 250 (84.4%) subjects completed the treatment protocol. On the 30-day follow-up, 247 (83.4%) subjects were available; on the 180-day follow-up, data were available for 241 (81.4%) subjects. We noted significant improvements for all postintervention outcome scores when compared with preintervention scores (P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Traction applied in the prone position using the VAX-D for 8 weeks was associated with improvements in pain intensity and RMDQ scores at discharge, and at 30 and 180 days after discharge in a sample of patients with activity-limiting LBP. Causal relationships between these outcomes and the intervention should not be made until further study is performed using randomized comparison groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18226650     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.06.778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Manual unloading of the lumbar spine: can it identify immediate responders to mechanical traction in a low back pain population? A study of reliability and criterion referenced predictive validity.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Sean P Riley; Mark P Cote; Robin R Leger; Isaac L Moss; John Carlos
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-05

2.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Steven Z George; Linda Van Dillen; Julie M Whitman; Gwendolyn Sowa; Paul Shekelle; Thomas R Denninger; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  No effect of traction in patients with low back pain: a single centre, single blind, randomized controlled trial of Intervertebral Differential Dynamics Therapy.

Authors:  Janneke J P Schimmel; M de Kleuver; P P Horsting; M Spruit; W C H Jacobs; J van Limbeek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Chiropractic Distraction Spinal Manipulation on Postsurgical Continued Low Back and Radicular Pain Patients: A Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Maruti R Gudavalli; Kurt Olding; George Joachim; James M Cox
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-05-25

5.  Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in backache patients before and after spinal traction.

Authors:  Amr Said Shalaby; Dina Rifaat El-Sharaki; Gelan Mahmoud Salem
Journal:  Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg       Date:  2018-12-29

6.  Effects of Different Angles of the Traction Table on Lumbar Spine Ligaments: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Hekmat Farajpour; Nima Jamshidi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-11-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.