Literature DB >> 18223615

Insurance coverage and incentives for weight loss among adults with metabolic syndrome.

David Arterburn1, Emily O Westbrook, Cheryl J Wiese, Evette J Ludman, David C Grossman, Paul A Fishman, Eric A Finkelstein, Robert W Jeffery, Adam Drewnowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how insured adults with metabolic syndrome respond to various options for insurance coverage and financial incentives for weight management. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Insured adults meeting the criteria for the metabolic syndrome were randomly identified through automated medical records and invited to participate in a telephone-based survey of the acceptability of various weight management programs-with different financial incentives and insurance coverage options-in a health maintenance organization. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test the relationship between participant characteristics and the odds of being motivated by incentives.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-three adults with the metabolic syndrome completed the survey (i.e., 79% of telephone contacts). A hypothetical increase in insurance coverage from 10 to 100% led to a threefold increase among women and a sevenfold increase among men in the proportion reporting they were "very interested" in enrolling in a weight management program within the next 30 days. Most participants (76% of women and 57% of men) supported a health plan-sponsored financial incentive program tied to weight loss, and 41% believed such a program would motivate them to lose weight. The mean financial incentive proposed for a 15-pound weight loss was $591 (median: $125). DISCUSSION: Although weight loss is an effective treatment for metabolic syndrome, standard health insurance rarely covers intensive behavioral treatment. The results of this study suggest that providing full insurance coverage and financial incentives for weight management increases the interest in participating in obesity treatment programs. Further research should determine how full coverage and incentives affect participation rates, long-term body weight changes, and costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18223615     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)        ISSN: 1930-7381            Impact factor:   5.002


  5 in total

1.  A two-year randomized trial of obesity treatment in primary care practice.

Authors:  Thomas A Wadden; Sheri Volger; David B Sarwer; Marion L Vetter; Adam G Tsai; Robert I Berkowitz; Shiriki Kumanyika; Kathryn H Schmitz; Lisa K Diewald; Ronald Barg; Jesse Chittams; Reneé H Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  A systematic review of financial incentives for dietary behavior change.

Authors:  Jason Q Purnell; Rebecca Gernes; Rick Stein; Margaret S Sherraden; Amy Knoblock-Hahn
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.910

3.  Financial motivation undermines maintenance in an intensive diet and activity intervention.

Authors:  Arlen C Moller; H Gene McFadden; Donald Hedeker; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2012-04-02

4.  Acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: thematic analysis of readers' comments to UK online news reports.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Matthew Holmes; Elaine McColl; Falko F Sniehotta; Jean M Adams
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Acceptability of financial incentives and penalties for encouraging uptake of healthy behaviours: focus groups.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Falko F Sniehotta; Elaine McColl; Jean Adams
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.