Literature DB >> 18223115

Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine.

Bruce A Wagner1, Barbara E Straw, Paula J Fedorka-Cray, David A Dargatz.   

Abstract

A body of evidence exists that suggests that antimicrobial use in food animals leads to resistance in both pathogenic and commensal bacteria. This study focused on the impact of three different antimicrobial regimes (low-level continuous, pulse, and no antimicrobial) for two antimicrobials (chlortetracycline and tylosin) on the presence of Salmonella spp. and on the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance of both Salmonella spp. and nonspecific Escherichia coli in fecal samples from feeder swine. The prevalence of fecal samples positive for Salmonella spp. significantly decreased between the samples taken at feeder placement compared to samples taken when the animals were close to market weight. Differences in resistance of Salmonella spp. did not appear to be influenced by dosing treatment including the control. Analysis of antimicrobial resistance examining both susceptibility and resistance, as well as MIC outcomes, demonstrated that only resistance to cephalothin increased in E. coli under the pulse chlortetracycline treatment. These results suggest that the dosing regimes examined in this study did not lead to an increase in either the prevalence of Salmonella spp. or the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in isolates of Salmonella spp. or E. coli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18223115      PMCID: PMC2268310          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01132-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Generally overlooked fundamentals of bacterial genetics and ecology.

Authors:  Anne O Summers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production.

Authors:  Wondwossen A Gebreyes; Siddhartha Thakur; W E Morgan Morrow
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.077

Review 3.  Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infections.

Authors:  K Gupta; T M Hooton; W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from humans, cattle, swine, and food.

Authors:  Carl M Schroeder; Cuiwei Zhao; Chitrita DebRoy; Jocelyn Torcolini; Shaohua Zhao; David G White; David D Wagner; Patrick F McDermott; Robert D Walker; Jianghong Meng
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evidence for transfer of CMY-2 AmpC beta-lactamase plasmids between Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolates from food animals and humans.

Authors:  P L Winokur; D L Vonstein; L J Hoffman; E K Uhlenhopp; G V Doern
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Fecal shedding of Salmonella spp. by dairy cows on farm and at cull cow markets.

Authors:  S J Wells; P J Fedorka-Cray; D A Dargatz; K Ferris; A Green
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica in growing pigs reared in multiple-site swine production systems.

Authors:  J A Funk; P R Davies; M A Nichols
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2001-10-22       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Ceftriaxone-resistant salmonella infection acquired by a child from cattle.

Authors:  P D Fey; T J Safranek; M E Rupp; E F Dunne; E Ribot; P C Iwen; P A Bradford; F J Angulo; S H Hinrichs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effects of administration of antimicrobials in feed on growth rate and feed efficiency of pigs in multisite production systems.

Authors:  Steve S Dritz; Michael D Tokach; Robert D Goodband; Jim L Nelssen
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 1.936

Review 10.  Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production.

Authors:  Gary L Cromwell
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.282

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of Tetracycline Dose and Treatment Mode on Selection of Resistant Coliform Bacteria in Nursery Pigs.

Authors:  Kaare Græsbøll; Peter Damborg; Anders Mellerup; Ana Herrero-Fresno; Inge Larsen; Anders Holm; Jens Peter Nielsen; Lasse Engbo Christiansen; Øystein Angen; Shahana Ahmed; Anders Folkesson; John Elmerdahl Olsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Population dynamics of enteric Salmonella in response to antimicrobial use in beef feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Naomi Ohta; Keri N Norman; Bo Norby; Sara D Lawhon; Javier Vinasco; Henk den Bakker; Guy H Loneragan; H Morgan Scott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effects of intramuscularly administered enrofloxacin on the susceptibility of commensal intestinal Escherichia coli in pigs (sus scrofa domestica).

Authors:  Antje Römer; Gesine Scherz; Saskia Reupke; Jessica Meißner; Jürgen Wallmann; Manfred Kietzmann; Heike Kaspar
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Treatment of pigs with enrofloxacin via different oral dosage forms - environmental contaminations and resistance development of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Paula Janssen; Gesine Barton; Manfred Kietzmann; Jessica Meißner
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Effect of tetracycline treatment regimens on antibiotic resistance gene selection over time in nursery pigs.

Authors:  Kaare Græsbøll; Inge Larsen; Julie Clasen; Anna Camilla Birkegård; Jens Peter Nielsen; Lasse Engbo Christiansen; John Elmerdahl Olsen; Øystein Angen; Anders Folkesson
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.605

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.