Literature DB >> 18222712

Indentation diagnostics of cartilage degeneration.

P Kiviranta1, E Lammentausta, J Töyräs, I Kiviranta, J S Jurvelin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical indentation and ultrasound (US) indentation instruments have been introduced for quantitative assessment of cartilage properties in vivo. In this study, we compared capabilities of these instruments to determine properties of healthy and spontaneously degenerated human patellar cartilage in situ and to diagnose the early stages of osteoarthritis (OA).
DESIGN: Six anatomical sites were localized from human patellae (N=14). By determining the force by which the tissue resists constant deformation (F(IND)), a mechanical indentation instrument was used to measure the compressive dynamic stiffness of cartilage. Further, the dynamic modulus (E(US)) and the US reflection coefficient of cartilage surface (R(US)) were measured with an US indentation instrument. For reference, Young's modulus and dynamic modulus were determined from cartilage disks using unconfined compression geometry. Proteoglycan and collagen contents of samples were analyzed microscopically. The samples were divided into three categories (healthy, early degeneration, and advanced degeneration) based on the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) OA-grading.
RESULTS: Parameters R(US), E(US) and F(IND) were significantly associated with the histological, compositional and mechanical properties of cartilage (|r|=0.28-0.72, n=73-75, P<0.05). Particularly, R(US) was able to discern degeneration of the samples with high sensitivity (0.77) and specificity (0.98). All parameters, except R(US,) showed statistically significant site-dependent variation in healthy cartilage.
CONCLUSIONS: US reflection measurement shows potential for diagnostics of early OA as no site-matched reference values are needed. In addition, the high linear correlations between indentation and reference measurements suggest that these arthroscopic indentation instruments can be used for quantitative evaluation of cartilage mechanical properties, e.g., after cartilage repair surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222712     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  27 in total

Review 1.  Call for standardized definitions of osteoarthritis and risk stratification for clinical trials and clinical use.

Authors:  V B Kraus; F J Blanco; M Englund; M A Karsdal; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  A Systematic Review and Guide to Mechanical Testing for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jay M Patel; Brian C Wise; Edward D Bonnevie; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  The use of polyacrylamide gels for mechanical calibration of cartilage--a combined nanoindentation and unconfined compression study.

Authors:  Cheng Li; Jessica Allen; Tamara Alliston; Lisa A Pruitt
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-02-24

4.  Quantitative MRI of Human Cartilage In Vivo: Relationships with Arthroscopic Indentation Stiffness and Defect Severity.

Authors:  Tuomas Svärd; Martti Lakovaara; Harri Pakarinen; Marianne Haapea; Ilkka Kiviranta; Eveliina Lammentausta; Jukka Jurvelin; Osmo Tervonen; Risto Ojala; Miika Nieminen
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Dexamethasone Release from Within Engineered Cartilage as a Chondroprotective Strategy Against Interleukin-1α.

Authors:  Brendan L Roach; Arta Kelmendi-Doko; Elaine C Balutis; Kacey G Marra; Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  In situ deformation of cartilage in cyclically loaded tibiofemoral joints by displacement-encoded MRI.

Authors:  D D Chan; C P Neu; M L Hull
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS): A Potential Arthroscopic Tool for Quantitative Assessment of Articular Cartilage.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Huang; Yong-Ping Zheng
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2009-06-26

Review 8.  Pre-clinical characterization of tissue engineering constructs for bone and cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Jordan E Trachtenberg; Tiffany N Vo; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Quantitative imaging of young's modulus of soft tissues from ultrasound water jet indentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Min-Hua Lu; Rui Mao; Yin Lu; Zheng Liu; Tian-Fu Wang; Si-Ping Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  ECM stiffness primes the TGFβ pathway to promote chondrocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Jessica L Allen; Margaret E Cooke; Tamara Alliston
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.