Literature DB >> 18222555

Direct and indirect contacts between cattle farms in north-west England.

M L Brennan1, R Kemp, R M Christley.   

Abstract

Little is known regarding the types and frequencies of contact that exist between farms and which of these may act as pathogen transmission routes; however it is likely that farms demonstrate considerable heterogeneity in such contacts. In this cross-sectional study, we explored the direct and indirect contact types and frequencies that exist between cattle farms within a region, focusing on potential routes of pathogen transmission. The owners/managers of 56 farms located in a 10 km by 10 km study area in north-west England were administered an interview-based questionnaire between June and September 2005. Information was obtained relating to contact types and frequencies, including those involving animal movements, equipment sharing between farms and any contractors or companies visiting the farms. The data was explored using hierarchical cluster analysis and network analysis. There was considerable variation between farms arising from different contact types. Some networks exhibited great connectivity, incorporating approximately 90% of the farms interviewed in a single component, whilst other networks were more fragmented, with multiple small components (sets of connected farms not linked with other farms). A range of factors influencing contact between farms were identified. For example, contiguous farms were more likely to be linked via other contacts, such as sharing of equipment and direct farm-to-farm animal movements (p<0.001 and p=0.02, respectively). The frequency of contacts was also investigated; it is likely that the amount of contact a farm receives from a company or contractor and whether or not biosecurity is performed after contact would impact on disease transmission potential. We found considerable heterogeneity in contact frequency and that many company and contractor personnel undertook little biosecurity. These findings lead to greater understanding of inter-farm contact and may aid development of appropriate biosecurity practices and control procedures, and inform mathematical modelling of infectious diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222555     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  21 in total

1.  Optimizing surveillance for livestock disease spreading through animal movements.

Authors:  Paolo Bajardi; Alain Barrat; Lara Savini; Vittoria Colizza
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Deterministic and stochastic analysis of an eco-epidemiological model.

Authors:  Chandan Maji; Debasis Mukherjee; Dipak Kesh
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 1.365

3.  Interaction effects between sender and receiver processes in indirect transmission of Campylobacter jejuni between broilers.

Authors:  Bram A D van Bunnik; Thomas J Hagenaars; Nico M Bolder; Gonnie Nodelijk; Mart C M de Jong
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Dynamical patterns of cattle trade movements.

Authors:  Paolo Bajardi; Alain Barrat; Fabrizio Natale; Lara Savini; Vittoria Colizza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Biosecurity on cattle farms: a study in north-west England.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Potential for epidemic take-off from the primary outbreak farm via livestock movements.

Authors:  Michael J Tildesley; Victoriya V Volkova; Mark Ej Woolhouse
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Patterns of between-farm contacts via professionals in Sweden.

Authors:  Emelie Olofsson; Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Contact networks in a wildlife-livestock host community: identifying high-risk individuals in the transmission of bovine TB among badgers and cattle.

Authors:  Monika Böhm; Michael R Hutchings; Piran C L White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A survey of visitors on Swedish livestock farms with reference to the spread of animal diseases.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Jenny Frössling; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.