Literature DB >> 18222390

A prospective evaluation of a simulator-based laparoscopic training program for gynecology residents.

Tyler O Kirby1, T Michael Numnum, Larry C Kilgore, J Michael Straughn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To determine prospectively if simulator-based laparoscopic training could improve laparoscopic skills of gynecology residents. STUDY
DESIGN: Twenty-six gynecology residents were enrolled in a laparoscopy training curriculum involving didactics, self-paced learning modules, and graded simulator-based laparoscopic training modules. Six simulator tasks were developed to introduce incremental levels of difficulty. Residents were tested on bead/peg manipulation, passing of a specially designed "key," cutting of lines and circles on a two-layer latex glove, and laparoscopic suturing followed by both intra- and extracorporeal knot tying. Times for each task and penalties for errors were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of training.
RESULTS: Twenty-six residents completed initial baseline and 3-month evaluations. Average summary time (including 30-seconds penalties for each error) at baseline was 64 minutes and 36 minutes at 3-month evaluation (p < 0.001). For PGY1 baseline summary times averaged 83 minutes compared with 50 minutes at 3 months (p = 0.006). For PGY4 baseline summary times averaged 49 minutes compared with 28 minutes at 3 months (p = 0.05). All individual tasks demonstrated substantial improvement (p < 0.001) from baseline to 3-month evaluation. Baseline summary scores demonstrated correlation between PGY training year and overall score (p < 0.001) consistent with earlier ability and training. Three-month scores demonstrated equalization of skill level across PGY2 through PGY4.
CONCLUSIONS: A dedicated simulator-based laparoscopic training curriculum has the ability to improve basic laparoscopic skills in a gynecologic residency, as measured by timed and scored simulator tasks. Construct validity was demonstrated by measuring substantial improvement in performance with increasing residency training, and with practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18222390     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  8 in total

1.  Surgeons and astronauts: so close, yet so far apart.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; David V Feliciano; Richard Reznick; Norman E McSwain
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Constructing a Novel Simple LEEP Training Model.

Authors:  Christen L Walters; Jenny M Whitworth; Sharon L Tyra; Julie B Walsh-Covarrubias; J Michael Straughn
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-06

Review 3.  Systematic review of the implementation of simulation training in surgical residency curriculum.

Authors:  Yo Kurashima; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Laparoscopic Simulators : Are They Useful!

Authors:  Pvr Mohan; R Chaudhry
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

5.  Assessment of laparoscopic training for gynecological malignancies using Thiel-embalmed human cadavers.

Authors:  Tomoka Usami; Toru Fujioka; Ayaka Yoshida; Hitomi Miyaue; Toshiaki Yasuoka; Yuka Uchikura; Kazuko Takagi; Yuko Matsubara; Takashi Matsumoto; Keiichi Matsubara; Takashi Sugiyama
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-09-07

6.  Hand-eye dominance and depth perception effects in performance on a basic laparoscopic skills set.

Authors:  Rabiya Suleman; Tong Yang; John Paige; Sheila Chauvin; Jaime Alleyn; Martha Brewer; Stephen I Johnson; Rodney J Hoxsey
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  The Relationship between Tests of Neurocognition and Performance on a Laparoscopic Simulator.

Authors:  Oumar Kuzbari; Howard Crystal; Pedram Bral; Rima A A Atiah; Imad Kuzbari; Amine Khachani; Muhammad Faisal Aslam; Howard Minkoff
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2010-06-24

8.  Laparoscopic suturing learning curve in an open versus closed box trainer.

Authors:  S P Rodrigues; T Horeman; M S H Blomjous; E Hiemstra; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.