Literature DB >> 18222380

Predictors of breast asymmetry after breast-conserving operation for breast cancer.

Jennifer F Waljee1, Emily S Hu, Lisa A Newman, Amy K Alderman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although breast-conserving surgery is the standard of care for early-stage breast cancer, many women report breast asymmetry after this procedure. Risk factors for poor esthetic outcomes are not well understood. STUDY
DESIGN: A self-administered survey was sent to patients who underwent lumpectomy (n = 898) at the University of Michigan Medical Center between January 2002 and May 2006 (n = 714, response rate = 79.5%). Breast asymmetry was assessed using items from the Breast Cancer Treatment and Outcomes Survey. Responses were summed to generate a score, and linear regression was used to generate adjusted breast asymmetry scores by patient-related factors (age, body mass index [BMI], tumor size, and tumor position in the breast) and treatment factors (reexcision lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and postoperative seroma).
RESULTS: Patient-related risk factors for breast asymmetry included younger age (asymmetry score: 18.7 versus 16.2, p = 0.03), higher BMI (17.1 versus 19.2, p = 0.007), and larger tumors (16.7 versus 19.1, p = 0.01). Resection of superior medial tumors and inferior lateral tumors was also associated with substantially higher asymmetry. Treatment-related risk factors for asymmetry included reexcision lumpectomy (18.1 versus 16.9, p = 0.013), postoperative seroma (19.3 versus 17.2, p = 0.005), and radiation therapy (17.9 versus 15.0, p = 0.008). Increasing breast asymmetry score was associated with a higher odds of desiring breast reconstruction (odds ratio = 1.2, 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.30).
CONCLUSIONS: Both patient- and treatment-related factors place women at risk for poor esthetic outcomes after breast-conserving surgery. Oncoplastic and reconstructive options should be considered for those at a higher risk for poor esthetic outcomes at the time of consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18222380     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

1.  Effect of Surgeon Factors on Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Therapy in Older Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Xiudong Lei; Kevin Diao; Ying Xu; Yu Shen; Grace L Smith; Sharon H Giordano; Sarah M DeSnyder; Kelly K Hunt; Mediget Teshome; Reshma Jagsi; Simona F Shaitelman; Susan K Peterson; Cameron W Swanick
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Prevalence, Clinical Significance and Risk Factors for Developing Scar Pain and Sensibility Disorders in Breast Cancer Patients after Breast-Conserving Therapy and Mastectomy.

Authors:  Max Dieterich; Sophie Allmendinger; Bernd Gerber; Toralf Reimer; Steffi Hartmann; Angrit Stachs; Johannes Stubert
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Paradigm shift in the local treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy to breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Kowsi Murugappan; Apoorva Saboo; Lu Kuo; Owen Ung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

4.  Predictors of margin status after breast-conserving operations in an underscreened population.

Authors:  Rozbeh Torabi; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Prahladbhai N Patel; Harikrishna Dave; Marcia E Bouton; Ian K Komenaka
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Oncoplastic approaches to breast conservation.

Authors:  Dennis R Holmes; Wesley Schooler; Robina Smith
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-08-22

6.  Systematization of Oncoplastic Surgery: Selection of Surgical Techniques and Patient-Reported Outcome in a Cohort of 1,035 Patients.

Authors:  Mahdi Rezai; Sarah Knispel; Stephanie Kellersmann; Hildegard Lax; Rainer Kimmig; Peter Kern
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Oncoplastic breast surgery: initial experience at the Centro Clinico de Estereotaxia-CECLINES, Caracas, Venezuela.

Authors:  V Acosta-Marin; V Acosta-Freites; A Contreras; R Ravelo; G Fuenmayor; C Marin; A Ramirez; M Acosta-Marin; J Perez-Fuentes; I Longobardi; H Esteves
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-10-14

8.  Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Cecilia Dahlbäck; Jonas Manjer; Martin Rehn; Anita Ringberg
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Stacey Fisher; Yutaka Yasui; Kelly Dabbs; Marcy Winget
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy.

Authors:  Ahmad Kaviani; Nassim Sodagari; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Vahid Eslami; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Amin Safavi; Maryam Noparast; Alfred Fitoussi
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.