Literature DB >> 18222251

Coronary artery bypass graft failure after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass: findings from PREVENT IV.

Mitchell J Magee1, John H Alexander, Gail Hafley, T Bruce Ferguson, C Michael Gibson, Robert A Harrington, Eric D Peterson, Robert M Califf, Nicholas T Kouchoukos, Morley A Herbert, Michael J Mack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This analysis compares 1-year vein graft patency and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE [death, myocardial infarction, or stroke]) in on-pump and off-pump patients enrolled in PREVENT IV (the PRoject of Ex-vivo Vein graft ENgineering via Transfection IV).
METHODS: The PREVENT IV was a multicenter (107 sites) randomized trial of edifoligide to prevent vein graft failure from neointimal hyperplasia in 3,014 patients undergoing primary, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with at least two vein grafts. One-year angiographic follow-up was completed on 1,920 patients (4,736 grafts) with MACCE follow-up on 99.4% of enrolled patients.
RESULTS: In all, 2,377 procedures (78.9%) were on pump and 637 (21.1%) were off pump. On-pump patients had more chronic lung disease (17% versus 11%; p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (10% versus 7%; p = 0.03), lower mean ejection fraction (50% versus 55%; p < 0.001), and worse target artery quality (good 63.8% versus 68.1%; fair 26.4% versus 22.7%; poor 9.8% versus 9.2%; p < 0.001). Vein graft failure (more than 75% graft stenosis) in on- versus off-pump patients was 25.3% versus 25.7% (p = 0.62). After adjusting for differences in significant predictors of vein graft failure (target artery quality, surgery time, endoscopic vein harvest, more than 1 distal anastomosis/graft, and patient weight), the odds of vein graft failure was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 1.00; p = 0.05) for on-pump versus off-pump patients. One-year mortality for on- versus off-pump patients was 3.3% versus 2.5% (p = 0.30); and MACCE was 15.4% versus 11.3% (p = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year MACCE was 1.31 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.69; p = 0.01) for on pump versus off pump.
CONCLUSIONS: Observed saphenous vein failure rate was 25% in both groups. One-year clinical outcomes (MACCE) were better with off-pump than with on-pump CABG, suggesting benefits not related to vein graft patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222251     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  25 in total

1.  Significance of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared with percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Akira Marui; Takeshi Kimura; Shiro Tanaka; Yutaka Furukawa; Toru Kita; Ryuzo Sakata
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass surgery: insights from PREVENT IV.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Renato D Lopes; C Michael Gibson; Rebecca Hager; Daniel M Wojdyla; Brian R Englum; Michael J Mack; Robert M Califf; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Eric D Peterson; John H Alexander
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Intraoperative graft assessment during coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Toshihiro Fukui
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-01-06

4.  Comparison of Mid-Term Graft Patency between On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Tatsuya Seki; Toshihito Yoshida
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 5.  Is endoscopic harvesting bad for saphenous vein graft patency in coronary surgery?

Authors:  Soroosh Kiani; Robert Poston
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Thinking inside the graft: applications of optical coherence tomography in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Emile N Brown; Nicholas S Burris; Junyan Gu; Zachary N Kon; Patrick Laird; Seeta Kallam; Cha-Min Tang; Joseph M Schmitt; Robert S Poston
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 7.  Current outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Daniel Fudulu; Umberto Benedetto; Gustavo Guida Pecchinenda; Pierpaolo Chivasso; Vito Domenico Bruno; Filippo Rapetto; Alan Bryan; Gianni Davide Angelini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Combined PCI and minimally invasive heart valve surgery for high-risk patients.

Authors:  Ramanan Umakanthan; Marzia Leacche; Michael R Petracek; David X Zhao; John G Byrne
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-12

9.  Endoscopic harvesting device type and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; J Matthew Brennan; Gail E Hafley; Eric M Reyes; Keith B Allen; T Bruce Ferguson; Eric D Peterson; Judson B Williams; C Michael Gibson; Michael J Mack; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; John H Alexander; Renato D Lopes
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Aspirin dosing frequency in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Joonseok Kim; Richard C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.