Literature DB >> 18222031

Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force.

M L Palmeri1, M H Wang, J J Dahl, K D Frinkley, K R Nightingale.   

Abstract

The speed at which shear waves propagate in tissue can be used to quantify the shear modulus of the tissue. As many groups have shown, shear waves can be generated within tissues using focused, impulsive, acoustic radiation force excitations, and the resulting displacement response can be ultrasonically tracked through time. The goals of the work herein are twofold: (i) to develop and validate an algorithm to quantify shear wave speed from radiation force-induced, ultrasonically-detected displacement data that is robust in the presence of poor displacement signal-to-noise ratio and (ii) to apply this algorithm to in vivo datasets acquired in human volunteers to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of using this method to quantify the shear modulus of liver tissue in longitudinal studies. The ultimate clinical application of this work is noninvasive quantification of liver stiffness in the setting of fibrosis and steatosis. In the proposed algorithm, time-to-peak displacement data in response to impulsive acoustic radiation force outside the region of excitation are used to characterize the shear wave speed of a material, which is used to reconstruct the material's shear modulus. The algorithm is developed and validated using finite element method simulations. By using this algorithm on simulated displacement fields, reconstructions for materials with shear moduli (mu) ranging from 1.3-5 kPa are accurate to within 0.3 kPa, whereas stiffer shear moduli ranging from 10-16 kPa are accurate to within 1.0 kPa. Ultrasonically tracking the displacement data, which introduces jitter in the displacement estimates, does not impede the use of this algorithm to reconstruct accurate shear moduli. By using in vivo data acquired intercostally in 20 volunteers with body mass indices ranging from normal to obese, liver shear moduli have been reconstructed between 0.9 and 3.0 kPa, with an average precision of +/-0.4 kPa. These reconstructed liver moduli are consistent with those reported in the literature (mu = 0.75-2.5 kPa) with a similar precision (+/-0.3 kPa). Repeated intercostal liver shear modulus reconstructions were performed on nine different days in two volunteers over a 105-day period, yielding an average shear modulus of 1.9 +/- 0.50 kPa (1.3-2.5 kPa) in the first volunteer and 1.8 +/- 0.4 kPa (1.1-3.0 kPa) in the second volunteer. The simulation and in vivo data to date demonstrate that this method is capable of generating accurate and repeatable liver stiffness measurements and appears promising as a clinical tool for quantifying liver stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222031      PMCID: PMC2362504          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  24 in total

1.  Complex-valued stiffness reconstruction for magnetic resonance elastography by algebraic inversion of the differential equation.

Authors:  T E Oliphant; A Manduca; R L Ehman; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography.

Authors:  Laurent Sandrin; Mickaël Tanter; Stefan Catheline; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 3.  Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues.

Authors:  James F Greenleaf; Mostafa Fatemi; Michael Insana
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Models and regulatory considerations for transient temperature rise during diagnostic ultrasound pulses.

Authors:  Bruce A Herman; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results.

Authors:  Kathryn Nightingale; Stephen McAleavey; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping.

Authors:  Jérémy Bercoff; Mickaël Tanter; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Sampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection.

Authors:  Arie Regev; Mariana Berho; Lennox J Jeffers; Clara Milikowski; Enrique G Molina; Nikolaos T Pyrsopoulos; Zheng-Zhou Feng; K Rajender Reddy; Eugene R Schiff
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging.

Authors:  Timothy J Hall; Yanning Zhu; Candace S Spalding
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis.

Authors:  Laurent Sandrin; Bertrand Fourquet; Jean-Michel Hasquenoph; Sylvain Yon; Céline Fournier; Frédéric Mal; Christos Christidis; Marianne Ziol; Bruno Poulet; Farad Kazemi; Michel Beaugrand; Robert Palau
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Pierre Bedossa; Delphine Dargère; Valerie Paradis
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  205 in total

1.  Shear modulus imaging with spatially-modulated ultrasound radiation force.

Authors:  Stephen McAleavey; Manoj Menon; Etana Elegbe
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.578

2.  Quantifying local stiffness variations in radiofrequency ablations with dynamic indentation.

Authors:  Ryan J DeWall; Tomy Varghese; Christopher L Brace
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Theoretical Analysis of Shear Wave Interference Patterns by Means of Dynamic Acoustic Radiation Forces.

Authors:  Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Int J Multiphys       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  Estimation of mechanical properties of a viscoelastic medium using a laser-induced microbubble interrogated by an acoustic radiation force.

Authors:  Sangpil Yoon; Salavat R Aglyamov; Andrei B Karpiouk; Seungsoo Kim; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  [Magnetic resonance elastography of the liver].

Authors:  I Sack; T Fischer; A Thomas; J Braun
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Shear wave velocity is a useful marker for managing nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Akihiko Osaki; Tomoyuki Kubota; Takeshi Suda; Masato Igarashi; Keisuke Nagasaki; Atsunori Tsuchiya; Masahiko Yano; Yasushi Tamura; Masaaki Takamura; Hirokazu Kawai; Satoshi Yamagiwa; Toru Kikuchi; Minoru Nomoto; Yutaka Aoyagi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Radiofrequency electrode vibration-induced shear wave imaging for tissue modulus estimation: a simulation study.

Authors:  Shyam Bharat; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

10.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) on an IVUS circular array.

Authors:  Vivek Patel; Jeremy J Dahl; David P Bradway; Joshua R Doherty; Seung Yun Lee; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.