Literature DB >> 18221944

Does substrate coarseness matter for foraging ants? An experiment with Lasius niger (Hymenoptera; Formicidae).

Abel Bernadou1, Vincent Fourcassié.   

Abstract

We investigated whether workers of the ant species Lasius niger are able to sense and discriminate the coarseness of the substrate on which they walk. First, we studied the way in which substrate coarseness affects the ants' locomotory behaviour. Second, we investigated the spontaneous preference of ants for substrates of different coarseness. And third, we tested with a differential conditioning procedure the ants' capacity to learn to associate a given coarseness with a food reward. The locomotory behaviour of ants differed according to substrate coarseness: ants moved significantly faster and had more sinuous trajectories on a fine than on a coarse substrate. No spontaneous preference for a substrate of a given coarseness was observed and, even after 20 successive conditioning trials, there was little evidence of the effect of experience on substrate coarseness discrimination. Overall however, ants trained on fine sand made significantly more correct choice than those trained on coarse sand. We discuss these results and argue that in L. niger substrate coarseness may be more important at the collective level, by interacting with the chemical properties of the pheromone trail used in mass recruitment to food source, than at the individual level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18221944     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  9 in total

1.  Excavated substrate modulates growth instability during nest building in ants.

Authors:  Etienne Toffin; Jonathan Kindekens; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  No effect of Zn-pollution on the energy content in the black garden ant.

Authors:  Irena M Grześ; Mateusz Okrutniak
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Foraging ants trade off further for faster: use of natural bridges and trunk trail permanency in carpenter ants.

Authors:  Raquel G Loreto; Adam G Hart; Thairine M Pereira; Mayara L R Freitas; David P Hughes; Simon L Elliot
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-10

4.  Trail formation based on directed pheromone deposition.

Authors:  Emmanuel Boissard; Pierre Degond; Sebastien Motsch
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance.

Authors:  Stacey A Combes; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  How do ants make sense of gravity? A Boltzmann Walker analysis of Lasius niger trajectories on various inclines.

Authors:  Anaïs Khuong; Valentin Lecheval; Richard Fournier; Stéphane Blanco; Sébastian Weitz; Jean-Jacques Bezian; Jacques Gautrais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Locomotion of Ants Walking up Slippery Slopes of Granular Materials.

Authors:  A Humeau; M Piñeirua; J Crassous; J Casas
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2019-09-13

8.  Fermat's principle of least time predicts refraction of ant trails at substrate borders.

Authors:  Jan Oettler; Volker S Schmid; Niko Zankl; Olivier Rey; Andreas Dress; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Uneven substrates constrain walking speed in ants through modulation of stride frequency more than stride length.

Authors:  G T Clifton; D Holway; N Gravish
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.