Literature DB >> 18221866

Socioeconomic disparities in psychosocial wellbeing in cancer patients.

Alice E Simon1, Jane Wardle.   

Abstract

This study tested the hypothesis that cancer patients from lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds have poorer adjustment to cancer. In a longitudinal study of 352 patients with breast, prostate or colorectal cancer, SES was indexed as a composite of educational level, car and home ownership. Patients were classified as higher (3 markers: car, home and higher education) or lower (up to 2 markers) SES. Patients completed measures of depression, anxiety, quality-of-life, social difficulties and benefit-finding at 2 months (Time 1) and 10 months (Time 2) after diagnosis. Data on disease stage, treatment and co-morbid illness were also collected. At Time 1, lower SES patients were more anxious and depressed and had worse quality-of-life and more social difficulties. Psychological wellbeing improved on all measures by follow-up, and although not significant, the trend was towards diminishing, rather than increasing, differences in wellbeing between higher and lower SES groups. Acute psychosocial reactions to a cancer diagnosis appeared to be greater amongst patients with fewer educational and material resources, but longer-term adjustment did not appear to be any worse in lower SES patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18221866     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  15 in total

1.  Differences in self-assessed health by socioeconomic group amongst people with and without a history of cancer: an analysis using representative data from Scotland.

Authors:  I M Atherton; J M M Evans; C J L Dibben; L M Woods; G Hubbard
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  The Influence of Social Determinants on Late Stage Breast Cancer for Women in Mississippi.

Authors:  Melody L Fortune
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-02-22

3.  Income and health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients over a one-year period after radical prostatectomy: a linear mixed model analysis.

Authors:  Jens Klein; Daniel Lüdecke; Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Self-efficacy beliefs mediate the relationship between subjective cognitive functioning and physical and mental well-being after hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Authors:  Lisa M Wu; Jane Austin; Jada G Hamilton; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Luis Isola; Scott Rowley; Rachel Warbet; Gary Winkel; William H Redd; Christine Rini
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Socioeconomic disparities of depressive symptoms and cytokines in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hoyee H Cheng; Thomas W Kamarck; Peter J Gianaros; Kathryn A Roecklein; Yanet Vanegas; Allan Tsung; David A Geller; James W Marsh; Nadia S Ahmed; Jennifer L Steel
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Identifying risk factors for depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Abigail S Robbertz; David M Weiss; Farrukh T Awan; John C Byrd; Kerry A Rogers; Jennifer A Woyach
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Socioeconomic status is associated with depressive severity among patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: treatment setting and minority status do not make a difference.

Authors:  Christopher Fagundes; Desiree Jones; Elisabeth Vichaya; Charles Lu; Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Multilevel socioeconomic effects on quality of life in adolescent and young adult survivors of leukemia and lymphoma.

Authors:  Erin E Kent; Leonard S Sender; Rebecca A Morris; Timothy J Grigsby; Michael J Montoya; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Score equivalence of electronic and paper versions of the Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI-21): a randomised crossover trial in cancer patients.

Authors:  Laura Ashley; Ada Keding; Julia Brown; Galina Velikova; Penny Wright
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Measuring prostate-specific quality of life in prostate cancer patients scheduled for radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy and reference men in Germany and Canada using the Patient Oriented Prostate Utility Scale-Psychometric (PORPUS-P).

Authors:  Annika Waldmann; Volker Rohde; Karen Bremner; Murray Krahn; Thomas Kuechler; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.