Literature DB >> 18221733

Gender difference in empathy for pain: an electrophysiological investigation.

Shihui Han1, Yan Fan, Lihua Mao.   

Abstract

Our recent event-related brain potential (ERP) study disentangled the neural mechanisms of empathy for pain into an early automatic emotional sharing component and a late controlled cognitive evaluation process. The current study further investigated gender difference in the neural mechanisms underlying empathy for pain by comparing ERPs associated with empathic responses between male and female adults. Subjects were presented with pictures of hands that were in painful or neutral situations and were asked to perform a pain judgment task that required attention to the pain cues in the stimuli or to perform a counting task that withdrew their attention from the pain cues. We found that both males and females showed a short-latency empathic response that differentiated painful and neutral stimuli over the frontal lobe at 140 ms after stimulus onset and a long-latency empathic response after 380 ms over the central-parietal regions. However, females were different from males in that the long-latency empathic response showed stronger modulation by task demands and that the ERP amplitudes at 140-180 ms were correlated with subjective reports of the degree of perceived pain of others and of unpleasantness of the self. Our ERP results provide neuroscience evidence for differences in both the early and late components of empathic process between the two sexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18221733     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  65 in total

1.  Emotional primes modulate the responses to others' pain: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jing Meng; Li Hu; Lin Shen; Zhou Yang; Hong Chen; Xiting Huang; Todd Jackson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Empathic neural responses to others' pain are modulated by emotional contexts.

Authors:  Shihui Han; Yan Fan; Xiaojing Xu; Jungang Qin; Bing Wu; Xiaoying Wang; Salvatore M Aglioti; Lihua Mao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neural substrates underlying intentional empathy.

Authors:  Moritz de Greck; Gang Wang; Xuedong Yang; Xiaoying Wang; Georg Northoff; Shihui Han
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Specific electrophysiological components disentangle affective sharing and empathic concern in psychopathy.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Kimberly L Lewis; Jason M Cowell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Social contexts modulate neural responses in the processing of others' pain: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Fang Cui; Xiangru Zhu; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Taking one's time in feeling other-race pain: an event-related potential investigation on the time-course of cross-racial empathy.

Authors:  Paola Sessa; Federica Meconi; Luigi Castelli; Roberto Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Atypical electrophysiological activity during pain observation in amputees who experience synaesthetic pain.

Authors:  Bernadette M Fitzgibbon; Peter G Enticott; Melita J Giummarra; Richard H Thomson; Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Increasing stimulus duration can normalize late-positive event related potentials in people with schizophrenia: Possible implications for understanding cognitive deficits.

Authors:  Bruce E Wexler; Satoru Ikezawa; Silvia Corbera
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Effects of cause of pain on the processing of pain in others: an ERP study.

Authors:  Zhenyong Lyu; Jing Meng; Todd Jackson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? A neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions.

Authors:  C Lithari; C A Frantzidis; C Papadelis; Ana B Vivas; M A Klados; C Kourtidou-Papadeli; C Pappas; A A Ioannides; P D Bamidis
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.