| Literature DB >> 18221530 |
Amit Kapoor1, Beth Shapiro, Robert W Shafer, Nancy Shulman, Soo-Yon Rhee, Eric L Delwart.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Combination anti-viral therapies have reduced treatment failure rates by requiring multiple specific mutations to be selected on the same viral genome to impart high-level drug resistance. To determine if the common protease inhibitor resistance mutation L90M is only selected once or repeatedly on different HIV genetic backbones during the course of failed anti-viral therapies we analyzed a linked region of the viral genome during the evolution of multi-drug resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18221530 PMCID: PMC2265302 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-5-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Figure 1Design and test of the L90M allele-specific PCR protocol. A. Alignment of AK90m primer with mutant L90M and wild-type L90 region of protease gene (subtype B consensus). B. PCR amplification using L90M specific primer of serial log dilutions of L90 (AKp136) and L90M (AKp140) plasmid derived generic gag-pro amplicons. C. Sensitivity of L90M allele specific PCR using serial dilution of AKp140 derived amplicon in a constant amount of AKp136 derived L90 amplicon. Ratio of L90M to L90 amplicons DNA is shown
Figure 2Summary tree showing the evolutionary relationships between all of the sequences used in this analysis, showing median node heights derived from 9000 posterior trees. Labels on the tips first show the sampling date in month and year and whether the generic (P for population) or L90M specific (M for mutant) PCR primers were used to generate the sequenced amplicons. The following number (1 through 6) represents the order of the bleeds analyzed. Patient numbers are given in the margin. Sequences that have the L90M mutation are indicated in darker bold fonts. Each patient forms a monophyletic cluster with 100% Bayesian posterior probability support (in 100% of posterior trees). Posterior support values for the monophyletic relationships of the sequences with the L90M mutation are given in Table 1. Patients with sequences showing evidence for multiple origins of L90M are shown in red, those with a single L90M origin in blue and those with an inconclusive number of L90M origins in black.
Probability of monophyletic origin for L90M sequences
| 608 | |
| 6501 | |
| 1125 | |
| 1174 | |
| 1317 | |
| 1124 | |
| 4334 | |
| 597 | |
| 7071 | |
| 1134 | |
| 1329 | |
| 1391 | |
| 1527 | |
| 1834 | |
| 2091 | |
The probability that sequences containing the L90M mutation within each patient were derived from a single (p≥0.95) or multiple (p≤0.05) mutation events, given as the proportion of 9000 trees drawn from the posterior distribution of the Bayesian MCMC analysis in which the sequences with the L90M mutations formed a monophyletic clade.