Literature DB >> 18218167

Early technology assessment of new medical devices.

Jan B Pietzsch1, M Elisabeth Paté-Cornell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, medical devices represent an eighty-billion dollar a year market. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration rejects a significant number of applications of devices that reach the investigational stage. The prospects of improving patient condition, as well as firms' profits, are thus substantial, but fraught with uncertainties at the time when investments and design decisions are made. This study presents a quantitative model focused on the risk aspects of early technology assessment, designed to support the decisions of medical device firms in the investment and development stages.
METHODS: The model is based on the engineering risk analysis method involving systems analysis and probability. It assumes use of all evidence available (both direct and indirect) and integrates the information through a linear formula of aggregation of probability distributions. The model is illustrated by a schematic version of the case of the AtrialShaper, a device for the reduction of stroke risk that is currently in the preprototype stage.
RESULTS: The results of the modeling provide a more complete description of the evidence base available to support early-stage decisions, thus allowing comparison of alternative designs and management alternatives.
CONCLUSIONS: The model presented here provides early-stage decision-support to industry, but also benefits regulators and payers in their later assessment of new devices and associated procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18218167     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462307080051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  14 in total

Review 1.  Review on early technology assessments of nanotechnologies in oncology.

Authors:  Valesca P Retèl; Marjan J M Hummel; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  A matter of accuracy. Nanobiochips in diagnostics and in research: ethical issues as value trade-offs.

Authors:  Ronan Le Roux
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review.

Authors:  Ba' Pham; Hong Anh Thi Tu; Dolly Han; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Fiona Miller; Valeria Rac; Warren Chin; Andrea C Tricco; Mike Paulden; Joanna Bielecki; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-23

4.  The role of health technology assessment bodies in shaping drug development.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; Claudio Jommi
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 4.162

5.  Conceptual model for early health technology assessment of current and novel heart valve interventions.

Authors:  Simone A Huygens; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken; Jos A Bekkers; Ad J J C Bogers; Carlijn V C Bouten; Steven A J Chamuleau; Peter P T de Jaegere; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Jolanda Kluin; Nicolas M D A van Mieghem; Michel I M Versteegh; Maarten Witsenburg; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2016-10-14

6.  Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies.

Authors:  Pascale Lehoux; Fiona A Miller; Geneviève Daudelin; Jean-Louis Denis
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Assessment of the added value of the Twente Photoacoustic Mammoscope in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Marjolein P Hilgerink; Marjan Jm Hummel; Srirang Manohar; Simon R Vaartjes; Maarten J Ijzerman
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2011-07-28

Review 8.  Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).

Authors:  Philip Wahlster; Mireille Goetghebeur; Christine Kriza; Charlotte Niederländer; Peter Kolominsky-Rabas
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Using multicriteria decision analysis to support research priority setting in biomedical translational research projects.

Authors:  Gimon de Graaf; Douwe Postmus; Erik Buskens
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Emerging Use of Early Health Technology Assessment in Medical Product Development: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Maarten J IJzerman; Hendrik Koffijberg; Elisabeth Fenwick; Murray Krahn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.