Literature DB >> 18217857

The Haig-Westoby model revisited.

Martin Burd1.   

Abstract

The Haig-Westoby model predicted that seed set in flowering plants would be equally limited by both pollen capture and resource supply because the optimal level of pollinator attraction should garner just the number of ovule fertilizations needed to consume the available seed-provisioning resources. Variability in the underlying resource and fertilization functions can disrupt this predicted optimum, a point made but only briefly explored by Haig and Westoby. Here I incorporate stochastic variation in both ovule fertilization and resource availability into the Haig-Westoby model and show that the modified model makes two noteworthy predictions: (1) pollen limitation of seed set (as measured by the response to supplemental pollen) should be common, and (2) the degree of pollen limitation may be greater when plants are more attractive to pollinators. The first prediction accords with recent meta-analyses of pollen limitation; the second remains to be examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18217857     DOI: 10.1086/527499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  11 in total

1.  Seasonal change in a pollinator community and the maintenance of style length variation in Mertensia fusiformis (Boraginaceae).

Authors:  Jessica R K Forrest; Jane E Ogilvie; Alex M Gorischek; James D Thomson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Nectar replenishment and pollen receipt interact in their effects on seed production of Penstemon roseus.

Authors:  Juan Francisco Ornelas; Carlos Lara
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Marcelo A Aizen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Selective embryo abortion in a perennial tree-legume: a case for maternal advantage of reduced seed number per fruit.

Authors:  H S Arathi
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Evolution towards minimum ovule size? Ovule size variations and the relative sizes of ovules to seeds.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Itagaki; Jun Mochizuki; Yuta Aoyagi Blue; Masaya Ito; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  The good, the bad and the flexible: plant interactions with pollinators and herbivores over space and time are moderated by plant compensatory responses.

Authors:  C R Lay; Y B Linhart; P K Diggle
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Pollination benefits are maximized at intermediate nutrient levels.

Authors:  Giovanni Tamburini; Francesco Lami; Lorenzo Marini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Mating systems and avoidance of inbreeding depression as evolutionary drivers of pollen limitation in animal-pollinated self-compatible plants.

Authors:  Céline Devaux; Emmanuelle Porcher; Russell Lande
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators.

Authors:  J R Reilly; D R Artz; D Biddinger; K Bobiwash; N K Boyle; C Brittain; J Brokaw; J W Campbell; J Daniels; E Elle; J D Ellis; S J Fleischer; J Gibbs; R L Gillespie; K B Gundersen; L Gut; G Hoffman; N Joshi; O Lundin; K Mason; C M McGrady; S S Peterson; T L Pitts-Singer; S Rao; N Rothwell; L Rowe; K L Ward; N M Williams; J K Wilson; R Isaacs; R Winfree
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Flight of the bumble bee: Buzzes predict pollination services.

Authors:  Nicole E Miller-Struttmann; David Heise; Johannes Schul; Jennifer C Geib; Candace Galen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.