Literature DB >> 18217851

A comparison of localization judgments and pointing precision.

Karl R Gegenfurtner1, Volker H Franz.   

Abstract

We compared the precision of perceptual localization and manual pointing. A Gaussian blob was presented 6 degrees to the right or left of a central fixation spot on a CRT screen. Above and below the blob, vertical lines were displayed. On each trial, the blob was slightly offset to the right or left with respect to the lines. The subjects had to judge whether the blob appeared to the right or to the left of the vertical lines. At the same time, they had to point to the center of the blob with their index finger. Precision for perceived position was significantly better than precision for pointing. Performance in these two tasks correlated highly between the subjects. Overall, subjects pointed more leftward on trials where they judged the blob to be to the left of the lines. There was also a significant correlation for each subject between the pointing error and the perceived location error, calculated by partialling out the effect of the physical offset. The results are in agreement with the idea that the signals determining the perceived location of an object are used to guide the motor system in pointing toward it.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217851     DOI: 10.1167/7.5.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  4 in total

1.  A common representation of spatial features drives action and perception: grasping and judging object features within trials.

Authors:  Jens H Christiansen; Jeppe Christensen; Thor Grünbaum; Søren Kyllingsbæk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Interdependences between finger movement direction and haptic perception of oriented textures.

Authors:  Alexandra Lezkan; Knut Drewing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Preeti Verghese; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The effects of ageing and visual field loss on pointing to visual targets.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Andrew J Anderson; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Mark J Walland; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.