Literature DB >> 18216697

Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.

Sandra Anić Milosević1, Marina Lapter Varga, Mladen Slaj.   

Abstract

One hundred and ten subjects (52 males and 58 females) between 23-28 years of age with dental Class I occlusal relationship, good soft tissue profile, and Caucasian ethnicity were selected from the population of dental students at the University of Zagreb, Croatia. The soft tissue facial profiles were digitally analyzed using linear (11 vertical and 14 horizontal) measurements made with standardized photographic records, taken in natural head position, to determine average soft tissue facial profile for males and females. The application of Student t-test showed gender dimorphism in most parameters of the labial, nasal. and chin areas. Almost all vertical variables were larger in the males, except the length of the nasal tip, which was larger in females. In the height of the vermilion, no gender dimorphism was observed. The females exhibited shallower labial sulci than the males and their chins were at least as prominent as those of the males. This study showed that male chins are not absolutely more prominent than female chins, but only appear to be such because their labial sulci are deeper.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18216697     DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31815c9446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  11 in total

1.  Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.

Authors:  Muge Aksu; Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Photographic Facial Soft Tissue Analysis by Means of Linear and Angular Measurements in an Adolescent Persian Population.

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Sheida Fathinejad; Zeinab Pakizeh; Mohammad Shamsa; Ali Golkari
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2015-07-31

3.  Photographic facial soft tissue analysis of healthy Iranian young adults: anthropometric and angular measurements.

Authors:  Alimohamad Asghari; Shahin Rajaeih; Fatemeh Hassannia; Negah Tavakolifard; Hamed Fattahi Neisyani; Seyed Kamran Kamrava; Maryam Jalessi; Parisa Omidian
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2014-06-29

Review 4.  Preventing the Complications Associated with the Use of Dermal Fillers in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: An Expert Group Consensus Report.

Authors:  Fernando Urdiales-Gálvez; Nuria Escoda Delgado; Vitor Figueiredo; José V Lajo-Plaza; Mar Mira; Francisco Ortíz-Martí; Rosa Del Rio-Reyes; Nazaret Romero-Álvarez; Sofía Ruiz Del Cueto; María A Segurado; Cristina Villanueva Rebenaque
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Arghavan Raoof; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Parisa Salehi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-03

6.  Reliability and Accuracy of 2D Photogrammetry: A Comparison With Direct Measurement.

Authors:  Yin Cheng Lim; Ameerah Su'ad Abdul Shakor; Rafiza Shaharudin
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-25

Review 7.  Inter-Ethnic/Racial Facial Variations: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Photogrammetric Studies.

Authors:  Yi Feng Wen; Hai Ming Wong; Ruitao Lin; Guosheng Yin; Colman McGrath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of facial beauty using anthropometric proportions.

Authors:  Jovana Milutinovic; Ksenija Zelic; Nenad Nedeljkovic
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-20

Review 9.  Perception of Facial Profile: How You Feel About Yourself.

Authors:  Mridula Trehan; Zuber Ahamed Naqvi; Sunil Sharma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04-15

10.  A longitudinal study of facial growth of Southern Chinese in Hong Kong: Comprehensive photogrammetric analyses.

Authors:  Yi Feng Wen; Hai Ming Wong; Colman Patrick McGrath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.