Accuracy of craniofacial measurements: computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography compared with stereolithographic models.

In a retrospective study, distance measurements of nine children with craniofacial malformation were analyzed. The accuracy of measurements was compared when measured on a workstation using a 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography and on a stereolithographic model. Three different methods of defining distances were investigated: 1) on the stereolithographic plastic models, 14 distances connecting landmarks were identified with a digitizer (Polaris Tracker); 2) the same distances were defined at axial, coronal, and sagittal reformats of the computed tomography data set and measured using a Philips MX View workstation; and 3) the same 14 distances were defined at three-dimensional virtual reality models of the skulls at the same workstation. All measurements were performed with all three methods by three different readers. The following conclusions could be drawn: stereolithographic models provide a highly exact reproduction of the skull in children with craniofacial malformations. They are a reliable basis for all analytic and probatory endeavors preparing complicated surgical corrections. Three-dimensional virtual reality display modes serve significantly better for exact distance measurements on the complex surface of the human skull than planar reformats of the same computed tomography data sets.