Literature DB >> 18216600

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with septic shock.

Dianne P Stephens1, Jane H Thomas, Alisa Higgins, Michael Bailey, Nicholas M Anstey, Bart J Currie, Allen C Cheng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of early administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on hospital mortality in nonneutropenic patients with septic shock, excluding patients with melioidosis.
DESIGN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Adult patients with septic shock admitted to the Royal Darwin Hospital Intensive Care Unit.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive G-CSF or placebo intravenously daily for 10 days, in addition to routine management of septic shock. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, ventilator hours, and time to resolution of shock. Patient comorbidities, baseline and daily physiology, and organ function were collected.
RESULTS: Of 166 patients enrolled, 83 were allocated to receive G-CSF (81 included in analysis) and 83 were allocated to receive placebo. At baseline, 30% of patients had diabetes, 18% were known to have renal impairment or failure, and 38% had a history of hazardous alcohol use. The two groups had similar comorbidities at baseline and a similar severity of illness. The in-hospital mortality was 27% in the G-CSF group and 25% in the placebo group. Secondary end points were not different between groups. There was a higher rate of new organ failure in G-CSF-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (50% vs. 33%, p = .03), most of which was accounted for by new liver dysfunction (11% vs. 1%, p = .007). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with troponin I of >0.08 mg/L (78% vs. 66%, p = .09), and the prevalence of acute myocardial infarction (6% vs. 4%, p = .55) was not different during the study. The median peak troponin I level was higher in the G-CSF group (0.5 vs. 0.14 mg/L, p = .007), but baseline levels were not available.
CONCLUSION: G-CSF does not improve outcomes in patients with septic shock, excluding melioidosis. Increased hepatic dysfunction and higher peak troponin levels in patients receiving G-CSF have not been reported in previous clinical trials and warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18216600     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E318161E480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  15 in total

1.  Angiopoietin-2 is increased in sepsis and inversely associated with nitric oxide-dependent microvascular reactivity.

Authors:  Joshua S Davis; Tsin W Yeo; Kim A Piera; Tonia Woodberry; David S Celermajer; Dianne P Stephens; Nicholas M Anstey
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ville Pettilä; Peter Buhl Hjortrup; Stephan M Jakob; Erika Wilkman; Anders Perner; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  An observational cohort study of the kynurenine to tryptophan ratio in sepsis: association with impaired immune and microvascular function.

Authors:  Christabelle J Darcy; Joshua S Davis; Tonia Woodberry; Yvette R McNeil; Dianne P Stephens; Tsin W Yeo; Nicholas M Anstey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) for sepsis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lulong Bo; Fei Wang; Jiali Zhu; Jinbao Li; Xiaoming Deng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Temperature Trajectory Subphenotypes Correlate With Immune Responses in Patients With Sepsis.

Authors:  Sivasubramanium V Bhavani; Krysta S Wolfe; Cara L Hrusch; Jared A Greenberg; Paulette A Krishack; Julie Lin; Paola Lecompte-Osorio; Kyle A Carey; John P Kress; Craig M Coopersmith; Anne I Sperling; Philip A Verhoef; Matthew M Churpek; Bhakti K Patel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 9.296

6.  Assessing Cellular Responses in Sepsis.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Sepsis-associated microvascular dysfunction measured by peripheral arterial tonometry: an observational study.

Authors:  Joshua S Davis; Tsin W Yeo; Jane H Thomas; Mark McMillan; Christabelle J Darcy; Yvette R McNeil; Allen C Cheng; David S Celermajer; Dianne P Stephens; Nicholas M Anstey
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Use in Decompensated Cirrhosis: Lack of Survival Benefit.

Authors:  Cyriac A Philips; Philip Augustine; Sasidharan Rajesh; Rizwan Ahamed; Tom George; Guruprasad Padsalgi; Rajaguru Paramaguru; Gopakumar Valiathan; Solomon K John
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-06-01

Review 9.  Balancing Innate Immunity and Inflammatory State via Modulation of Neutrophil Function: A Novel Strategy to Fight Sepsis.

Authors:  Haoshu Fang; Wei Jiang; Jin Cheng; Yan Lu; Anding Liu; Lixin Kan; Uta Dahmen
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.818

Review 10.  The changing immune system in sepsis: is individualized immuno-modulatory therapy the answer?

Authors:  Jonathan S Boomer; Jonathan M Green; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.