Literature DB >> 18216572

Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up.

Luca Buzzonetti1, Gianni Petrocelli, Paola Valente, Ciro Tamburrelli, Luigi Mosca, Antonio Laborante, Emilio Balestrazzi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare corneal aberration changes 1 year after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) performed with a mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser.
METHODS: Twenty four eyes of 15 patients underwent LASIK with the Hansatome microkeratome, and 23 eyes of 13 patients underwent LASIK with the IntraLase femtosecond laser. A standard ablation was performed with the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217 excimer laser. Topography data were used to calculate corneal aberrations with a 3.0 mm and 5.00 mm pupil, before and 12 months after surgery. The increasing factor (IF), defined as the ratio between the postoperative and preoperative mean value of the optical aberration, was calculated. The method of Mulhern et al was used to evaluate the centration of ablation. The comalike aberration was correlated with the decentration of ablation. The Student t test was used for the statistical anaylsis.
RESULTS: The postoperative mean decentration of ablation was <0.5 mm. The comalike aberration appeared to be positively correlated with the decentration of ablation in both groups with a 5.0-mm pupil (P < 0.05). With a 3.00-mm pupil, the comalike aberration changed in the Hansatome group, whereas with a 5.00-mm pupil, all aberrations statistically significantly changed in both groups (P < 0.05). The IF similarly increased in 2 groups for spherical-like aberration, whereas IF greatly increased for total and comalike aberrations in the Hansatome group.
CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront corneal aberrations change significantly 1 year after myopic LASIK performed with the Hansatome microkeratome as well as with IntraLase femtosecond lasers. Both of the procedures induce higher-order aberrations in the anterior corneal surface, but the amount of comalike aberration increases more with the Hansatome mechanical microkeratome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18216572     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815a50bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Hong-Ting Liu; Zhou Zhou; Wu-Qiang Luo; Wen-Jing He; Owhofasa Agbedia; Jiang-Xia Wang; Jian-Zhong Huang; Xin Gao; Min Kong; Min Li; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

3.  Comparison of LASEK, mechanical microkeratome LASIK and Femtosecond LASIK in low and moderate myopia.

Authors:  Khalid AlArfaj; Mohamed M Hantera
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-11

4.  Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Ramón Calvo; Jay W McLaren; David O Hodge; William M Bourne; Sanjay V Patel
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  [Results of 308 consecutive femtosecond laser cuts for LASIK].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth; V Derhartunian; D Kook
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Higher-order aberrations after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Michelle H Hu; Alfred J White; Evan S Loft; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Importance of fixation, pupil center, and reference axis in ocular wavefront sensing, videokeratography, and retinal image quality.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; Larry N Thibos; Michael D Twa; Edwin J Sarver
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK.

Authors:  Li-Kun Xia; Jie Yu; Guang-Rui Chai; Dang Wang; Yang Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  [Wavefront analysis in ophthalmologic diagnostics].

Authors:  M J Sanchez; A Mannsfeld; A F M Borkenstein; A Ehmer; I-J Limberger; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.