Literature DB >> 18216220

The effects of microstimulation of the dorsomedial frontal cortex on saccade latency.

Shun-nan Yang1, Stephen J Heinen, Marcus Missal.   

Abstract

Neural regions in the dorsomedial frontal cortex (DMFC), including the supplementary eye field (SEF) and the presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA), are likely candidates for generating top-down control of saccade target selection. To investigate this, we applied electrical microstimulation to these structures while saccades were being planned to visual targets. Stimulation administered to superficial and lateral DMFC sites that were within or close to the SEF delayed ipsilateral and facilitated contralateral saccades. Facilitation was limited to saccades made toward targets in a narrow, contralateral movement field that had endpoints consistent with the goal of evoked saccades. Facilitation occurred with current delivered before target onset and delay with current applied after this time. Stimulation at deeper, medial sites that encompassed the pre-SMA resulted in mostly bilateral delay. The amount of delay at these sites was usually greater for ipsilateral saccades and increased with current amplitude. Changes in saccade latency were not accompanied by altered endpoint, trajectory, or peak velocity. The spatial specificity of SEF stimulation in inducing latency changes suggests that the SEF participates in selecting saccade goals. The less specific delay with pre-SMA stimulation suggests that it is involved in postponing visually guided saccades, thus likely permitting other oculomotor structures to select saccade goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18216220     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00119.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Supplementary eye field activity reflects a decision rule governing smooth pursuit but not the decision.

Authors:  Shun-nan Yang; Helen Hwang; Joel Ford; Stephen Heinen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Intracortical microstimulation of supplementary eye field impairs ability of monkeys to make serially ordered saccades.

Authors:  Tamara K Berdyyeva; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Desirability, availability, credit assignment, category learning, and attention: Cognitive-emotional and working memory dynamics of orbitofrontal, ventrolateral, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-05-08

4.  Functionally dissociating temporal and motor components of response preparation in left intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Julien Cotti; Gustavo Rohenkohl; Mark Stokes; Anna C Nobre; Jennifer T Coull
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Individual differences in impulsivity predict anticipatory eye movements.

Authors:  Laetitia Cirilli; Philippe de Timary; Phillipe Lefèvre; Marcus Missal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Real-time learning of predictive recognition categories that chunk sequences of items stored in working memory.

Authors:  Sohrob Kazerounian; Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06

7.  Evidence for a functional subdivision of Premotor Ear-Eye Field (Area 8B).

Authors:  Marco Lanzilotto; Vincenzo Perciavalle; Cristina Lucchetti
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Reversed Procrastination by Focal Disruption of Medial Frontal Cortex.

Authors:  Ashwani Jha; Beate Diehl; Catherine Scott; Andrew W McEvoy; Parashkev Nachev
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Voluntary saccade inhibition deficits correlate with extended white-matter cortico-basal atrophy in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Israel Vaca-Palomares; Brian C Coe; Donald C Brien; Aurelio Campos-Romo; Douglas P Munoz; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Electrical Microstimulation of the Pulvinar Biases Saccade Choices and Reaction Times in a Time-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas; Lukas Schneider; Melanie Wilke; Igor Kagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.