Literature DB >> 18216176

Specific regions within the embryonic midbrain and cerebellum require different levels of FGF signaling during development.

M Albert Basson1, Diego Echevarria, Christina Petersen Ahn, Anamaria Sudarov, Alexandra L Joyner, Ivor J Mason, Salvador Martinez, Gail R Martin.   

Abstract

Prospective midbrain and cerebellum formation are coordinated by FGF ligands produced by the isthmic organizer. Previous studies have suggested that midbrain and cerebellum development require different levels of FGF signaling. However, little is known about the extent to which specific regions within these two parts of the brain differ in their requirement for FGF signaling during embryogenesis. Here, we have explored the effects of inhibiting FGF signaling within the embryonic mouse midbrain (mesencephalon) and cerebellum (rhombomere 1) by misexpressing sprouty2 (Spry2) from an early stage. We show that such Spry2 misexpression moderately reduces FGF signaling, and that this reduction causes cell death in the anterior mesencephalon, the region furthest from the source of FGF ligands. Interestingly, the remaining mesencephalon cells develop into anterior midbrain, indicating that a low level of FGF signaling is sufficient to promote only anterior midbrain development. Spry2 misexpression also affects development of the vermis, the part of the cerebellum that spans the midline. We found that, whereas misexpression of Spry2 alone caused loss of the anterior vermis, reducing FGF signaling further, by decreasing Fgf8 gene dose, resulted in loss of the entire vermis. Our data suggest that cell death is not responsible for vermis loss, but rather that it fails to develop because reducing FGF signaling perturbs the balance between vermis and roof plate development in rhombomere 1. We suggest a molecular explanation for this phenomenon by providing evidence that FGF signaling functions to inhibit the BMP signaling that promotes roof plate development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18216176      PMCID: PMC2555978          DOI: 10.1242/dev.011569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  51 in total

Review 1.  Neuroepithelial secondary organizers and cell fate specification in the developing brain.

Authors:  Diego Echevarría; Claudia Vieira; Lourdes Gimeno; Salvador Martínez
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2003-10

2.  Control of roof plate formation by Lmx1a in the developing spinal cord.

Authors:  Victor V Chizhikov; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  Roof plate-dependent patterning of the vertebrate dorsal central nervous system.

Authors:  Victor V Chizhikov; Kathleen J Millen
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Structural basis by which alternative splicing modulates the organizer activity of FGF8 in the brain.

Authors:  Shaun K Olsen; James Y H Li; Carrie Bromleigh; Anna V Eliseenkova; Omar A Ibrahimi; Zhimin Lao; Fuming Zhang; Robert J Linhardt; Alexandra L Joyner; Moosa Mohammadi
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family.

Authors:  Xiuqin Zhang; Omar A Ibrahimi; Shaun K Olsen; Hisashi Umemori; Moosa Mohammadi; David M Ornitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  FGFR1 is independently required in both developing mid- and hindbrain for sustained response to isthmic signals.

Authors:  Ras Trokovic; Nina Trokovic; Sanna Hernesniemi; Ulla Pirvola; Daniela M Vogt Weisenhorn; Janet Rossant; Andrew P McMahon; Wolfgang Wurst; Juha Partanen
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Dosage of Fgf8 determines whether cell survival is positively or negatively regulated in the developing forebrain.

Authors:  Elaine E Storm; John L R Rubenstein; Gail R Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  sprouty4 acts in vivo as a feedback-induced antagonist of FGF signaling in zebrafish.

Authors:  M Fürthauer; F Reifers; M Brand; B Thisse; C Thisse
Journal:  Development       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  FGF8 induces formation of an ectopic isthmic organizer and isthmocerebellar development via a repressive effect on Otx2 expression.

Authors:  S Martinez; P H Crossley; I Cobos; J L Rubenstein; G R Martin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo.

Authors:  P H Crossley; G R Martin
Journal:  Development       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  62 in total

1.  Repression of Fgf signaling by sprouty1-2 regulates cortical patterning in two distinct regions and times.

Authors:  Andrea Faedo; Ugo Borello; John L R Rubenstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Signaling in cell differentiation and morphogenesis.

Authors:  M Albert Basson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signalling in the control of neural stem and progenitor cell (NSPC) development.

Authors:  Alexander Annenkov
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  The Engrailed homeobox genes determine the different foliation patterns in the vermis and hemispheres of the mammalian cerebellum.

Authors:  Yulan Cheng; Anamaria Sudarov; Kamila U Szulc; Sema K Sgaier; Daniel Stephen; Daniel H Turnbull; Alexandra L Joyner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  FGF signaling is strictly required to maintain early telencephalic precursor cell survival.

Authors:  Hunki Paek; Grigoriy Gutin; Jean M Hébert
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Pax3 regulation of FGF signaling affects the progression of embryonic progenitor cells into the myogenic program.

Authors:  Mounia Lagha; Jay D Kormish; Didier Rocancourt; Marie Manceau; Jonathan A Epstein; Kenneth S Zaret; Frédéric Relaix; Margaret E Buckingham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Neuron-derived FGF9 is essential for scaffold formation of Bergmann radial fibers and migration of granule neurons in the cerebellum.

Authors:  Yongshun Lin; Lijie Chen; Chunhong Lin; Yongde Luo; Robert Y L Tsai; Fen Wang
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Regulation of self-renewing neural progenitors by FGF/ERK signaling controls formation of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Alexander Dee; Kairong Li; Xin Heng; Qiuxia Guo; James Y H Li
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 6.868

9.  Fgf8b-containing spliceforms, but not Fgf8a, are essential for Fgf8 function during development of the midbrain and cerebellum.

Authors:  Qiuxia Guo; Kairong Li; N Abimbola Sunmonu; James Y H Li
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Sprouty2-mediated inhibition of fibroblast growth factor signaling is modulated by the protein kinase DYRK1A.

Authors:  Sergi Aranda; Mónica Alvarez; Silvia Turró; Ariadna Laguna; Susana de la Luna
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.