Literature DB >> 18215762

Women's health insurance coverage 1980-2005.

Sherry Glied1, Kathrine Jack, Jason Rachlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the fragmented US health insurance system, women's health insurance coverage is an outcome both of changes in the availability of private and public health insurance and of changing patterns of labor force participation and household formation. Over the past 2 decades, women's socioeconomic circumstances have changed and public policy around health insurance coverage for low-income women has also undergone substantial modification.
METHODS: This study examines the roles of these changes in circumstances and policy on the level and composition of women's health insurance. Using the Census Bureau's March Current Population Survey 1980-2005, the government's principal source of nationally representative labor market and health insurance data, we examine how changes in marriage, full-time and part-time labor force participation, and public policy around coverage affected the level and source of women's health insurance coverage over 3 periods: 1980-1987, 1988-1994, and 1995-2005.
RESULTS: Health insurance coverage rates have fallen for both women and men since 1980. What makes women different is that, in addition to the decline in coverage, the composition of health insurance coverage for women has also changed markedly. More women now obtain health insurance on their own, rather than as dependents, than did in 1980. A larger fraction of insured women are now enrolled in Medicaid than were in 1980. Women's routes to coverage have changed as their social and economic circumstances have changed and as policy, especially Medicaid policy, has evolved.
CONCLUSIONS: Women's channels for obtaining health insurance coverage are more fragmented than those of men. The availability of multiple sources of coverage, and the possibility of moving amongst them, have not, however, insulated women from the overall declines in health insurance coverage caused by the rising cost of private health insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18215762     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  5 in total

1.  Understanding disparities in lipid management among patients with type 2 diabetes: gender differences in medication nonadherence after treatment intensification.

Authors:  John Billimek; Shaista Malik; Dara H Sorkin; Priel Schmalbach; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Sheldon Greenfield; Sherrie H Kaplan
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-11-22

2.  Trends in Gestational Diabetes Among Hospital Deliveries in 19 U.S. States, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Barbara H Bardenheier; Giuseppina Imperatore; Suzanne M Gilboa; Linda S Geiss; Sharon H Saydah; Heather M Devlin; Shin Y Kim; Edward W Gregg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The Affordable Care Act and Access to Care for Reproductive-Aged and Pregnant Women in the United States, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Jamie R Daw; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Trends in pre-pregnancy diabetes among deliveries in 19 U.S. states, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Barbara H Bardenheier; Giuseppina Imperatore; Heather M Devlin; Shin Y Kim; Pyone Cho; Linda S Geiss
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Factors associated with a lack of pap smear utilization in women exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Camp; Angela W Prehn; Ji Shen; Arthur L Herbst; William C Strohsnitter; Christopher D Hobday; Stanley J Robboy; Ervin Adam
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.681

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.