Literature DB >> 18215683

Sealing ability of a new polydimethylsiloxane-based root canal filling material.

Ahmet R Ozok1, Lucas W M van der Sluis, Min-Kai Wu, Paul R Wesselink.   

Abstract

We tested the null hypothesis that there is no difference in the sealing ability of GuttaFlow, RoekoSeal, and AH26 in root canals. Sixty extracted mandibular premolars were filled with AH26 (lateral compaction), RoekoSeal, or GuttaFlow (modified single-cone). The sealing ability of the root canal fillings was measured weekly (4 weeks) by using a glucose penetration model. Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences in glucose penetration between the experimental groups at weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4. Whereas GuttaFlow showed the highest amount of leakage at all times, AH26 showed the lowest. There was no significant difference between RoekoSeal-filled and AH26-filled root canals throughout the experimental period. AH26 showed better sealing ability in root canals than GuttaFlow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18215683     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  12 in total

1.  [Microleakage of root canal fillings with GuttaFlow and Resilon compared with lateral condensation].

Authors:  Lumnije Kqiku; Ivana Miletic; Hans Jürgen Gruber; Ivica Anic; Peter Städtler
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-05

2.  3D analyses of interface voids in root canals filled with different sealer materials in combination with warm gutta-percha technique.

Authors:  M Wolf; K Küpper; S Reimann; C Bourauel; M Frentzen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of laterally condensed, vertically compacted thermoplasticized, cold free-flow GP obturations - A volumetric analysis using spiral CT.

Authors:  Deivanayagam Kandaswamy; Nagendrababu Venkateshbabu; Reddy Gopi Krishna; Rosaline Hannah; Ganesh Arathi; Riaz Roohi
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2009-10

4.  Comparative evaluation of sealing properties of different obturation systems placed over apically fractured rotary NiTi files.

Authors:  Sonali Taneja; Rupali Chadha; Ruchi Gupta; Anupama Gupta
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-01

5.  Comparing subcutaneous tissue responses to freshly mixed and set root canal sealers.

Authors:  Setareh Derakhshan; Alireza Adl; Masoud Parirokh; Fatemeh Mashadiabbas; Ali Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2009-10-10

6.  Impact of root canal preparation size and taper on coronal-apical micro-leakage using glucose penetration method.

Authors:  Mehdi Tabrizizadeh; Maryam Kazemipoor; Seyed-Hossein Hekmati-Moghadam; Roqayeh Hakimian
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of marginal adaptation of AH-Plus, GuttaFlow, and RealSeal at apical one-third of root canals - Part II: Core-sealer interface.

Authors:  Haridas Das Adhikari; Sakshi Jain
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

8.  An in vitro comparative study of the adaptation and sealing ability of two carrier-based root canal obturators.

Authors:  Ahmed Alkahtani; Sara Al-Subait; Sukumaran Anil
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-05-09

9.  Evaluation of the quality of four root canal obturation techniques using micro-computed tomography.

Authors:  Mandana Naseri; Ali Kangarlou; Atefeh Khavid; Mostafa Goodini
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-08-01

10.  Lack of correlation between tubular dentine cement penetration, adhesiveness and leakage in roots filled with gutta percha and an endodontic cement based on epoxy amine resin.

Authors:  Ricardo Machado; Ulisses Xavier da Silva Neto; Everdan Carneiro; Luiz Fernando Fariniuk; Vânia Portela Ditzel Westphalen; Rodrigo Sanches Cunha
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.