Literature DB >> 18215666

Anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection following a primary intraosseous injection.

Joanne Jensen1, John Nusstein, Melissa Drum, Al Reader, Mike Beck.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, single-blinded study was to determine the anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection given 30 minutes after a primary intraosseous injection. Using a crossover design, 55 subjects randomly received a primary X-tip intraosseous injection (Dentsply Inc, York, PA) of 1.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (using the Wand; Milestone Scientific, Deerfield, IL) and a repeated intraosseous or mock injection at 30 minutes in two appointments. The first molar and adjacent teeth were pulp tested every 2 minutes for a total of 120 minutes. Success was defined as obtaining two consecutive 80 readings with the electric pulp tester. Success of the initial intraosseous injection was 100% for the first molar. The repeated intraosseous injection mimicked the initial intraosseous injection in terms of pulpal anesthesia and statistically provided another 15 minutes of pulpal anesthesia. In conclusion, using the methodology presented, repeating the intraosseous injection 30 minutes after an initial intraosseous injection will provide an additional 15 minutes of pulpal anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18215666     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

Review 1.  Effective anaesthesia of the acutely inflamed pulp: part 2. Clinical strategies.

Authors:  S S Virdee; S Bhakta; D Seymour
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Intraosseous anaesthesia in children with 4 % articaine and epinephrine 1:400,000 using computer-assisted systems.

Authors:  J-L Sixou; A Marie-Cousin
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-08-08

3.  Side effects and complications of intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia.

Authors:  David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Javier Ata-Ali; María-José Oltra-Moscardó; María Peñarrocha-Diago; Miguel Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-05-01

4.  Comparative study between manual injection intraosseous anesthesia and conventional oral anesthesia.

Authors:  D Peñarrocha-Oltra; J Ata-Ali; M-J Oltra-Moscardó; M-A Peñarrocha-Diago; M Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 5.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

6.  Inferior alveolar nerve block by intraosseous injection with Quicksleeper® at the retromolar area in mandibular third molar surgery.

Authors:  Sam Sovatdy; Chakorn Vorakulpipat; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Chavengkiat Saengsirinavin; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-12-28

7.  Transpapillary Injection Technique as a Substitute for Palatal Infiltration: A Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria A Sruthi; Mahesh Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct

8.  Root damage induced by intraosseous anesthesia. An in vitro investigation.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Karim-Mohamed Fawzy-El-Sayed; Nicole Graetz; Christof-Edmund Dörfer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.