Literature DB >> 18214706

Medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination: findings from an international cross-sectional and longitudinal study.

Charlotte E Rees1, Andy M Wearn, Anna K Vnuk, Toshio J Sato.   

Abstract

Although studies have begun to shed light on medical students' attitudes towards peer physical examination (PPE), they have been conducted at single sites, and have generally not examined changes in medical students' attitudes over time. Employing both cross-sectional and longitudinal designs, the current study examines medical students' attitudes towards PPE at schools from different geographical and cultural regions and assess changes in their attitudes over their first year of medical study. Students at six schools (Peninsula, UK; Durham, UK; Auckland, New Zealand; Flinders, Australia; Sapporo, Japan and Li Ka Shing, Hong Kong) completed the Examining Fellow Students (EFS) questionnaire near the start of their academic year (T1), and students at four schools (Peninsula, Durham, Auckland and Flinders) completed the EFS for a second time, around the end of their academic year (T2). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed a high level of acceptance for PPE of non-intimate body regions amongst medical students from all schools (greater than 83%, hips, at T1 and 94.5%, hips and upper body, at T2). At T1 and T2, students' willingness to engage in PPE was associated with their gender, ethnicity, religiosity and school. Typically, students least comfortable with PPE at T1 and T2 were female, non-white, religious and studying at Auckland. Although students' attitudes towards PPE were reasonably stable over their first year of study, and after exposure to PPE, we did find some statistically significant differences in attitudes between T1 and T2. Interestingly, attitude changes were consistently predicted by gender, even when controlling for school. While male students' attitudes towards PPE were relatively stable over time, females' attitudes were changeable. In this paper, we discuss our findings in light of existing research and theory, and discuss their implications for educational practice and further research.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18214706     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-007-9094-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  10 in total

1.  Mental health of Medical Students in Different Levels of Training.

Authors:  Najmeh Jafari; Amir Loghmani; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-03

2.  Perception of peer physical examination in two Australian osteopathy programs.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Sandra Grace
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-07-11

3.  Australian medical students have fewer opportunities to do physical examination of peers of the opposite gender.

Authors:  Silas Taylor; Boaz Shulruf
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2016-11-23

Review 4.  Physical examination in undergraduate medical education in the field of general practice - a scoping review.

Authors:  Dirk Moßhammer; Joachim Graf; Stefanie Joos; Rebekka Hertkorn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  A Mokken scale analysis of the peer physical examination questionnaire.

Authors:  Brett Vaughan; Sandra Grace
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Prevalence of depressive symptoms and its related factors among students at Tra Vinh University, Vietnam in 2018.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Hong Tuyen; Truong Quang Dat; Huynh Thi Hong Nhung
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2019-08-22

7.  A Trauma-Informed Approach to Peer Physical Examination.

Authors:  Sadie Elisseou; Emily Adams; Maya Adler
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2022-08-30

8.  New context, new content-Rethinking genital anatomy in textbooks.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hayes; Meredith J Temple-Smith
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 6.652

9.  Evaluation of the acceptability of Peer Physical Examination (PPE) in medical and osteopathic students: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  Fabrizio Consorti; Rosaria Mancuso; Annalisa Piccolo; Giacomo Consorti; Joseph Zurlo
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Willingness of medical students to be examined in a physical examination course.

Authors:  Manuel Burggraf; Julia Kristin; Alexander Wegner; Sascha Beck; Stephanie Herbstreit; Marcel Dudda; Marcus Jäger; Max Daniel Kauther
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.