OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of plasma N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations (NT-proBNP) as a diagnostic tool to recognize acute respiratory failure (ARF) of cardiac origin. METHODS: Prospective observational study in 100 medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. NT-proBNP was measured at ICU admission, and diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction was performed using echocardiography. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had cardiac ARF, 58 patients had noncardiac ARF, and 26 patients were non-ARF controls. Median (IQR) NT-proBNP was 1,951 (617-9,320) pg/ml and was significantly influenced by the level of renal dysfunction. Patients with noncardiac ARF had higher NT-proBNP [1,912 (704-1,922) pg/ml] than non-ARF patients [1,022 (383-2,613) pg/ml], but lower concentrations than cardiac ARF patients [4,536 (1,568-35,171) pg/ml]. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.663+/-0.078 (95% confidence interval 0.510-0.815) and was not significantly influenced by the level of renal dysfunction. In addition, using a stepwise logistic regression model, NT-proBNP failed to predict independently the presence of cardiac dysfunction. However, with specificity and negative predictive value of 100%, a NT-proBNP cutoff value of 500 pg/ml seemed useful to rule out cardiac dysfunction. Indeed, none of the 16 patients with cardiac ARF had a NT-proBNP value below 500 pg/ml, whereas it was the case in 8 (30.8%) non-ARF controls and in 12 (20.7%) noncardiac ARF patients. CONCLUSIONS: In cancer patients with ARF, plasma NT-proBNP concentration is not a relevant tool to recognize cardiac dysfunction, but is specific enough to rule out the diagnosis in patients with plasma NT-proBNP concentrations below 500 pg/ml.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of plasma N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations (NT-proBNP) as a diagnostic tool to recognize acute respiratory failure (ARF) of cardiac origin. METHODS: Prospective observational study in 100 medical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. NT-proBNP was measured at ICU admission, and diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction was performed using echocardiography. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had cardiac ARF, 58 patients had noncardiac ARF, and 26 patients were non-ARF controls. Median (IQR) NT-proBNP was 1,951 (617-9,320) pg/ml and was significantly influenced by the level of renal dysfunction. Patients with noncardiac ARF had higher NT-proBNP [1,912 (704-1,922) pg/ml] than non-ARFpatients [1,022 (383-2,613) pg/ml], but lower concentrations than cardiac ARFpatients [4,536 (1,568-35,171) pg/ml]. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.663+/-0.078 (95% confidence interval 0.510-0.815) and was not significantly influenced by the level of renal dysfunction. In addition, using a stepwise logistic regression model, NT-proBNP failed to predict independently the presence of cardiac dysfunction. However, with specificity and negative predictive value of 100%, a NT-proBNP cutoff value of 500 pg/ml seemed useful to rule out cardiac dysfunction. Indeed, none of the 16 patients with cardiac ARF had a NT-proBNP value below 500 pg/ml, whereas it was the case in 8 (30.8%) non-ARF controls and in 12 (20.7%) noncardiac ARF patients. CONCLUSIONS: In cancerpatients with ARF, plasma NT-proBNP concentration is not a relevant tool to recognize cardiac dysfunction, but is specific enough to rule out the diagnosis in patients with plasma NT-proBNP concentrations below 500 pg/ml.
Authors: M T Meinardi; D J van Veldhuisen; J A Gietema; W V Dolsma; F Boomsma; M P van den Berg; C Volkers; J Haaksma; E G de Vries; D T Sleijfer; W T van der Graaf Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-05-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Philippe Gabriel Steg; Laurence Joubin; James McCord; William T Abraham; Judd E Hollander; Torbjorn Omland; France Mentré; Peter A McCullough; Alan S Maisel Journal: Chest Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: D Gruson; G Hilbert; L Portel; J M Boiron; C M Bebear; F Vargas; C Bebear; J Reiffers; G Gbikpi-Benissan; J P Cardinaud Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Paul R Forfia; Stanley P Watkins; J Eduardo Rame; Kerry J Stewart; Edward P Shapiro Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-05-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Rochus Witthaut; Christian Busch; Peter Fraunberger; Autar Walli; Dietrich Seidel; Günter Pilz; Ralph Stuttmann; Norbert Speichermann; Ljifane Verner; Karl Werdan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-08-12 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 17.440