Literature DB >> 1821386

Neuropsychological assessment for detecting adverse effects of volatile organic compounds on the central nervous system.

K I Bolla1.   

Abstract

Because there are no direct biological markers for the substances implicated in indoor air exposure, it is impossible to directly measure if an individual or group of individuals has been exposed to a potentially neurotoxic substance in the workplace. Behavioral changes may be the earliest and only manifestation of central nervous system (CNS) effects and are often too subtle to be revealed by routine physical or neurological examination. Neuropsychological techniques are sensitive to subtle behavioral/cognitive changes that can result from exposure to neurotoxins. These techniques consist of oral and written tests that are administered by a trained examiner on a one-to-one basis. In general, a wide variety of cognitive domains are evaluated. The typical battery generally includes assessing orientation, attention, intelligence, language, visual memory, verbal memory, perception, visuoconstruction, simple motor speed, psychomotor speed, and mood. As with most assessment techniques, the neuropsychological methods have limitations. One major drawback is the availability of appropriate norms that are used to compare the results of a specific individual. Because these tasks are greatly affected by age, intelligence, and in some instances sex, the availability of appropriate norms is mandatory to determine if the CNS has been effected. Although neuropsychological tests are sensitive to the presence of CNS involvement, they are not specific. Patterns of performance seen with specific instances of neurotoxic exposure may also be seen with a number of other diseases of the CNS such as dementia, cerebrovascular disease, hydrocephalus, or normal aging. In addition, neuropsychiatric symptoms such as anxiety and/or depression are often manifested as cognitive difficulties that will mimic the cognitive dysfunction seen with toxicity of the CNS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1821386      PMCID: PMC1568404          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.919593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  10 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Conditioning of physical symptoms after neurotoxic exposure.

Authors:  K Bolla-Wilson; R J Wilson; M L Bleecker
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1988-09

3.  Assessment of neuropsychological dysfunction in the workplace: normative data from the Pittsburgh Occupational Exposures Test Battery.

Authors:  C M Ryan; L A Morrow; E J Bromet; D K Parkinson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Recognition of occupation-induced posttraumatic stress disorders.

Authors:  R S Schottenfeld; M R Cullen
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1986-05

5.  Psychiatric disorders and industrial toxicology.

Authors:  W L Sutton
Journal:  Int Psychiatry Clin       Date:  1969

6.  Learning and memory impairments in young and old alcoholics: evidence for the premature-aging hypothesis.

Authors:  C Ryan; N Butters
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Occupation-induced posttraumatic stress disorders.

Authors:  R S Schottenfeld; M R Cullen
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Bedside cognitive screening instruments. A critical assessment.

Authors:  A Nelson; B S Fogel; D Faust
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  Age-specific norms for the Mini-Mental State Exam.

Authors:  M L Bleecker; K Bolla-Wilson; C Kawas; J Agnew
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Age-related sex differences in verbal memory.

Authors:  M L Bleecker; K Bolla-Wilson; J Agnew; D A Meyers
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1988-05
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Longitudinal study on potential neurotoxic effects of aluminium: II. Assessment of exposure and neurobehavioral performance of Al welders in the automobile industry over 4 years.

Authors:  Ernst Kiesswetter; M Schäper; M Buchta; K H Schaller; B Rossbach; T Kraus; S Letzel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Longitudinal study on potential neurotoxic effects of aluminium: I. Assessment of exposure and neurobehavioural performance of Al welders in the train and truck construction industry over 4 years.

Authors:  E Kiesswetter; M Schäper; M Buchta; K H Schaller; B Rossbach; H Scherhag; W Zschiesche; S Letzel
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.015

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.