Literature DB >> 1821362

Formaldehyde exposure and health status in households.

I Broder1, P Corey, P Brasher, M Lipa, P Cole.   

Abstract

This report describes a case study concerned with acute and subacute health effects of formaldehyde in the indoor air, which is based on a large group of control houses and houses retroinsulated 4 to 5 years earlier with urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI). Both groups underwent an environmental and health assessment on two occasions separated by an interval of 12 months, during which about one-half of the UFFI group performed remedial work on their houses. The results show that in the first survey of the study population, before remedial work, there was a moderate excess of many adverse health status indicators among the UFFI subset relative to the controls. This was associated with the presence of direct exposure-response relationships between formaldehyde levels in the UFFI houses and the prevalence of a number of symptoms. No comparable relationships were seen among the controls. At the second survey, performed following the removal of the UFFI, there was an appreciable reduction in the excess of most adverse health status indicators among the UFFI subjects. This improvement in health status among the UFFI removal subset was not associated with any significant diminution of formaldehyde exposures, although the previously observed exposure-response relationships had vanished. These observations imply that the findings obtained in the preremedial stage of the study cannot be explained by formaldehyde exposure alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1821362      PMCID: PMC1568408          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9195101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of health of occupants and characteristics of houses among control homes and homes insulated with urea formaldehyde foam. III. Health and house variables following remedial work.

Authors:  I Broder; P Corey; P Brasher; M Lipa; P Cole
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Comparison of health of occupants and characteristics of houses among control homes and homes insulated with urea formaldehyde foam. I. Methodology.

Authors:  I Broder; P Corey; P Cole; M Lipa; S Mintz; J R Nethercott
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Comparison of health of occupants and characteristics of houses among control homes and homes insulated with urea formaldehyde foam. II. Initial health and house variables and exposure-response relationships.

Authors:  I Broder; P Corey; P Cole; M Lipa; S Mintz; J R Nethercott
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Formaldehyde complaint investigations in mobile homes by the Texas Department of Health.

Authors:  S W Norsted; C A Kozinetz; J F Annegers
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Formaldehyde exposure in nonoccupational environments.

Authors:  K A Dally; L P Hanrahan; M A Woodbury; M S Kanarek
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec

6.  Formaldehyde vapor in mobile homes: a cross sectional survey of concentrations and irritant effects.

Authors:  L P Hanrahan; K A Dally; H A Anderson; M S Kanarek; J Rankin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.