| Literature DB >> 18213484 |
M Auslander1, Y Yudkovski, V Chalifa-Caspi, B Herut, R Ophir, R Reinhardt, P M Neumann, M Tom.
Abstract
Individuals of the fish Lithognathus mormyrus were exposed to a series of pollutants including: benzo[a]pyrene, pp-DDE, Aroclor 1254, perfluorooctanoic acid, tributyl-tin chloride, lindane, estradiol, 4-nonylphenol, methyl mercury chloride, and cadmium chloride. Five mixtures of the pollutants were injected. Each mixture included one to three compounds. A microarray was constructed using 4608 L. mormyrus hepatic cDNAs cloned from the pollutant-exposed fish. Most clones (4456) were sequenced and assembled into 1494 annotated unique clones. The constructed microarray was used to identify changes in hepatic gene expression profile on exposure to cadmium administered to the fish by feeding or injections. Thirty-one unique clones showed altered expression levels on exposure to cadmium. Prominently differentially expressed genes included elastase 4, carboxypeptidase B, trypsinogen, perforin, complement C31, cytochrome P450 2K5, ceruloplasmin, carboxyl ester lipase, and metallothionein. Twelve sequences have no available annotation. Most genes (23) were downregulated and hypothesized to be affected by general toxicity due to the intensive cadmium exposure regime. The concept of an operational multigene cDNA microarray, aimed at routine and fast biomonitoring of multiple environmental threats, is outlined and the cadmium exposure experiment has been used to demonstrate functional and methodological aspects of the biomonitoring tool. The components of the outlined system include: (1) spotted array, composed of both pollution-affected and constitutively expressed genes, the latter are used for normalization; (2) standard, repeatable labeling procedure of a reference transcript population; and (3) biomarker indices derived from the profile of expression ratio across the pollution-affected genes, between the field-sampled transcript populations and the reference.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18213484 PMCID: PMC2921062 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-007-9060-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Biotechnol (NY) ISSN: 1436-2228 Impact factor: 3.619
Fig. 1Hybridization design. Each arrow connects two cDNA samples which are dual-hybridized on the same slide. Arrow tail, Cy3; arrowhead, Cy5. (A) and (B) are two alternative hybridization designs, aimed at balancing putative dye effect. Each design was performed twice with different individual fish
Real-time PCR results normalized to β-actin expression levels
| Accession no. | Amplified RNA | PCR primer pair | Real- time PCR ΔCP normalized to β-actin expression | Competence between PCR ΔCPs and | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DQ850666 | Metallothionein | F: AAGGGAAGACCTGCGACACTAG | 4.5 | 2.04 | + |
| R: TCACAAGGGCAGCAAGCA | |||||
| DQ850591 | Carboxypeptidase B | F: CTGCTCTGCGTAGTCTGTACGG | −2.1 | −2.09 | + |
| R: GGAATACTTCACACCCAGGTCG | |||||
| DQ850208 | Carboxyl ester lipase | F: CAGAAGATGAGGCTGCGTTACG | −2.2 | −1.51 | + |
| R: GAAGTACAGGTGATGGCACAAGC | |||||
| DQ849772 | Complement component C3 | F:TTACTTGGCCCTCTTGTGTGG | 0.9 | −1.14 | − |
| R: CAACAGGCAGTCAAATCAAGCC | |||||
| DQ849874 | Cytochrome P4502k5 | F: TGGTTGAAGCTCATCAGAATTCC | 0.6 | −1.3 | − |
| R: CCCTTGCATGGATTCAGATAGG | |||||
| DQ850737 | β-actin | F: CATCCTGCGTCTGGACTTGG | |||
| R: GATTTCCCTCTCGGCTGTGG |
M-values were obtained from the microarray analysis.
Fig. 2Hepatic levels of metallothionein transcript and cadmium in relation to the routes of cadmium applications. The line graph presents metallothionein transcript levels and the bar graph, cadmium levels. MT, Metallothionein; Cd, cadmium
Differentially expressed striped sea bream hepatic unique clones after exposure to cadmium
| Accession no. | Gene annotation | Resembled species | Number of clones | Averaged | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visualized clones of (mean | Differentially expressed clones | |||||||
| FI | F | I | F | I | ||||
| DQ850610 | Mitochondrial cytochrome | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −0.97* | ||
| DQ849967 | Mitochondrial cytochrome | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | −0.65 ± 0.11* | −0.88 ± 0.1* | |
| DQ850573 | Elastase 4-like protein | 21 | 0 | 0 | 16 | −1.52 ± 0.31* | ||
| DQ850591 | Carboxypeptidase B | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | −1.47 ± 0.34* | −2.09 ± 0.4* | |
| DQ849726 | Trypsinogen-like protein | 19 | 0 | 0 | 9 | −1.76 ± 0.25* | ||
| DQ851090 | Kininogen | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | −0.86 | ||
| DQ850843 | Heparin cofactor II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1.05 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | |
| DQ849772 | X- CO3_ONCMY and complement C31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.14* | ||
| DQ850497 | Perforin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.11 | ||
| DQ849947 | OMY519930 C1R/C1S subunit of Ca2+-dependent complex | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.59 | ||
| DQ849874 | Cytochrome P450 (CYP2K5) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.3 | ||
| DQ849703 | Ceruloplasmin | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.84* | 0.81* | |
| DQ850163 | Glutathione peroxidase | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.66 | ||
| DQ850208 | Carboxyl ester lipase | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.51 | ||
| DQ849880 | Sop-prov protein | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.16 | ||
| DQ850666 | Metallothionein | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.26* | 2.04 ± 0.48* | |
| DQ850735 | Putative transferrin | 9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | −0.64 ± 0.06 | −0.92 ± 0.18 | |
| DQ850849 | Vitellogenin | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.71 | ||
| DQ850712 | Gastrula specific embryonic protein 1 | 48 | 3 | 3 | 8 | −0.51 ± 0.06 | −0.64 ± 0.08 | |
| DQ849656 | (Q5BXC0) Hypothetical protein | 8 | 1 | 1 | 4 | −0.85 | −0.86 ± 0.31 | |
| DQ849739 | CNS0FK72 full-length cDNA | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | −0.64 | −0.58 | |
| DQ850009 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.83 ± 0.3 | |||
| DQ850829 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −0.77 | |||
| DQ849818 | CNS0G66Q full-length cDNA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −0.48 | −0.81 | |
| DQ850314 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.42 | |||
| DQ850888 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.95 | |||
| DQ850970 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −0.48 | |||
| DQ851001 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.29 | |||
| DQ850538 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.72 | |||
| DQ849829 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.05 | |||
| DQ850030 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | −1.39 | |||
Each unique clone is characterized by its accession number, short description of the most resembled sequence and GO annotations, number of clones of meanA > 9, significantly differentially expressed clones, and their average M-values. F, Cadmium fed; I, cadmium injected; FI, both treatments.
*Denotes correspondence with the results of Reynders et al. (2006).
Fig. 3Clustering of M-value profiles obtained from binary comparisons of individual treated fish to the averaged reference. Injected 1–4 are cadmium-injected fish and Fed 1–4 are cadmium-fed fish
List of unique clones that were elucidated in clusters A to C (Fig. 3)