Daniel Cornfeld1, Jeffery Weinreb. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042, USA. daniel.cornfeld@yale.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Simply transposing 1.5-T abdominal and pelvic MRI protocols to 3-T scanners does not result in optimized images. Simple modifications can be made to preexisting 1.5-T protocols to obtain image quality at 3 T that is comparable to that at 1.5 T. CONCLUSION: We illustrate several simple modifications to 1.5-T body protocols that maintain image quality at 3 T.
OBJECTIVE: Simply transposing 1.5-T abdominal and pelvic MRI protocols to 3-T scanners does not result in optimized images. Simple modifications can be made to preexisting 1.5-T protocols to obtain image quality at 3 T that is comparable to that at 1.5 T. CONCLUSION: We illustrate several simple modifications to 1.5-T body protocols that maintain image quality at 3 T.
Authors: H Michael Gach; Stacie L Mackey; Sarah E Hausman; Danielle R Jackson; Tammie L Benzinger; Lauren Henke; Lindsay A Murphy; Jamie L Fluchel; Bin Cai; Jacqueline E Zoberi; Jose Garcia-Ramirez; Sasa Mutic; Julie K Schwarz Journal: Radiol Case Rep Date: 2019-03-15
Authors: M Bazot; N Bharwani; C Huchon; K Kinkel; T M Cunha; A Guerra; L Manganaro; L Buñesch; A Kido; K Togashi; I Thomassin-Naggara; A G Rockall Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 5.315