Literature DB >> 18211579

Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms.

Steven L Percival1, Phil Bowler, Emma J Woods.   

Abstract

To date the effect of silver-containing wound dressings on biofilms, known to be present in chronic wounds, has not been determined or documented. In this current study, we aimed to determine the antimicrobial effect of a silver-containing dressing on biofilms grown in a chambered slide model. Before the addition of a wound dressing onto a 24-hour biofilm, composed of either Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, Staphylococcus aureus, or a mixed bacterial community, a fluorescent dye was applied. This enabled the viability of sessile bacteria to be monitored in real-time, using a rapid form of confocal laser scanning microscopy over a contact time period of 48 hours. By analyzing all the three-dimensional data generated from the confocal time-lapse sequences, 90% of all sessile bacteria within the biofilm were observed to progressively turn red (i.e., died) within 24 hours. Total bacterial kill in the biofilm was achieved after 48 hours. This research has shown that the dressing was effective in killing the tested bacteria evident in both the tested mono and polymicrobial biofilms, which provides valuable evidence that this dressing may have an effect on biofilms found in recalcitrant chronic wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211579     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00350.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  25 in total

1.  Impact of silver-containing wound dressings on bacterial biofilm viability and susceptibility to antibiotics during prolonged treatment.

Authors:  Victoria Kostenko; Jeffrey Lyczak; Katherine Turner; Robert John Martinuzzi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs.

Authors:  Charne Nicole Miller; Keryln Carville; Nelly Newall; Suzanne Kapp; Gill Lewin; Leila Karimi; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Biofilms: do they affect wound healing?

Authors:  Collette H Thomson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds: international consensus document.

Authors:  David Leaper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  An in vitro biofilm model to examine the effect of antibiotic ointments on biofilms produced by burn wound bacterial isolates.

Authors:  Adrienne A Hammond; Kyle G Miller; Cassandra J Kruczek; Janet Dertien; Jane A Colmer-Hamood; John A Griswold; Alexander R Horswill; Abdul N Hamood
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.744

6.  Anti-biofilm efficacy of a lactoferrin/xylitol wound hydrogel used in combination with silver wound dressings.

Authors:  Mary Cloud B Ammons; Loren S Ward; Garth A James
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Microbiology of the skin and the role of biofilms in infection.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Charlotte Emanuel; Keith F Cutting; David W Williams
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Anti-biofilm efficacy of nitric oxide-releasing silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Evan M Hetrick; Jae Ho Shin; Heather S Paul; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  A comparison of bacterial composition in diabetic ulcers and contralateral intact skin.

Authors:  Viktoria Gontcharova; Eunseog Youn; Yan Sun; Randall D Wolcott; Scot E Dowd
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2010-03-17

10.  Evaluation of the bacterial diversity among and within individual venous leg ulcers using bacterial tag-encoded FLX and titanium amplicon pyrosequencing and metagenomic approaches.

Authors:  Randall D Wolcott; Viktoria Gontcharova; Yan Sun; Scot E Dowd
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.