Literature DB >> 18211443

The extension of epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section: a survey of current UK practice.

K J Regan1, G O'Sullivan.   

Abstract

The conversion of epidural analgesia during labour to surgical anaesthesia for Caesarean section can have important medical and medicolegal implications. This survey sought to establish the current management for extending epidural blockade for emergency Caesarean section. A postal questionnaire was sent to the lead obstetric anaesthetist in all maternity units in the UK (n = 254). The response rate was 82% (n = 209). Of those surveyed, 68% (136) give the full dose of the local anaesthetic mixture in the delivery room, whilst 12.5% (25) initiate the top-up in the delivery room and give the remainder of the dose in theatre. Fifteen per cent (30) transfer the woman to theatre before commencing anaesthesia and 34% (68) give a test dose before the full anaesthetic dose. Guidelines for converting labour analgesia to anaesthesia for emergency Caesarean section were available in 64% (128) units. Bupivacaine 0.5% was the most commonly used agent, being used as the sole agent by 41.5% (81) units and in combination by a further 18% (36). Adrenaline was added to the chosen local anaesthetic by 30% (60) whilst 12% (24) added bicarbonate. In all, 13 combinations of local anaesthetics and adjuncts were used. The mode time to transfer the patient to theatre was 1 min. Of the 161 respondents who commenced anaesthesia in the delivery room, 71% (114) did not monitor the patient during transfer, whilst 87% (140) had ephedrine immediately available. Thirty-three respondents reported a total of 43 adverse incidents associated with the extension of epidural blockade. These included high blocks, inadequate blocks and possible intravascular injections, the latter resulting in two seizures and one cardiac arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211443     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05319.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  8 in total

Review 1.  Conversion of labour epidural analgesia to surgical anaesthesia for emergency intrapartum Caesarean section.

Authors:  N Desai; B Carvalho
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-11-19

2.  Risk factors for labor epidural conversion failure requiring general anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Shannon M Grap; Gaurav R Patel; Jessica Huang; Sonia J Vaida
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  A survey of perioperative and postoperative anesthetic practices for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Leinani Aiono-Le Tagaloa; Alexander J Butwick; Brendan Carvalho
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-24

4.  [Anesthesia in obstetrics: Tried and trusted methods, current standards and new challenges].

Authors:  P Kranke; T Annecke; D H Bremerich; R Hanß; L Kaufner; C Klapp; H Ohnesorge; U Schwemmer; T Standl; S Weber; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Algorithm for the anesthetic management of cesarean delivery in patients with unsatisfactory labor epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Sonia Vaida; Davide Cattano; Debra Hurwitz; Berend Mets
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-04-24

6.  Suspected total spinal in patient having emergent Caesarean section, a case report and literature review.

Authors:  H Virgin; E Oddby; J G Jakobsson
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-03

Review 7.  Anaesthetic management of obstetric emergencies.

Authors:  Pradeep A Dongare; Madagondapalli S Nataraj
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-09

8.  Anesthetic Conversion of Preexisting Labor Epidural Analgesia for Emergency Cesarean Section and Efficacy of Levobupivacaine with or Without Magnesium Sulphate: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Mona Raafat Elghamry; Tamer Mohamed Naguib; Radwa Fathy Mansour
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-03-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.