Literature DB >> 18210925

Blunt splenic trauma: predictors for successful non-operative management.

Miklosh Bala1, Yair Edden, Yoav Mintz, David Kisselgoff, Irina Gercenstein, Avraham I Rivkind, Muhammad Farugy, Gidon Almogy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma is the preferred option in hemodynamically stable patients.
OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors for the successful non-operative management of patients with blunt splenic trauma.
METHODS: The study group comprised consecutive patients admitted with the diagnosis of blunt splenic trauma to the Department of Surgery, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Jerusalem over a 3 year period. Prospectively recorded were hemodynamic status, computed tomography grade of splenic tear, presence and extent of extra-abdominal injury, number of red blood cell units transfused, and outcome. Hemodynamic instability and the severity of associated injuries were used to determine the need for splenectomy. Hemodynamically stable patients without an indication for laparotomy were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit and monitored.
RESULTS: There were 64 adults (45 males, mean age 30.2 years) who met the inclusion criteria. On univariate analysis the 13 patients (20.3%) who underwent immediate splenectomy were more likely to have lower admission systolic blood pressure (P= 0.001), Glasgow Coma Scale < 8 (P= 0.02), and injury to at least three extra-abdominal regions (P= 0.06). Nine of the 52 patients (17.3%) who were successfully treated non-operatively suffered from grade > or = 4 splenic tear. Multivariate analysis identified admission systolic BP (odds ratio 1.04) and associated injury to less than three extra-abdominal regions (OD 8.03) as predictors for the success of non-operative management, while the need for blood transfusion was a strong predictor (OR 66.67) for splenectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Admission systolic blood pressure and limited extra-abdominal injury can be used to identify patients with blunt splenic trauma who do not require splenectomy and can be safely monitored outside an ICU environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18210925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J            Impact factor:   0.892


  5 in total

1.  Splenic injuries: factors affecting the outcome of non-operative management.

Authors:  A Böyük; M Gümüş; A Önder; M Kapan; I Aliosmanoğlu; F Taşkesen; Z Arıkanoğlu; E Gedik
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma centre from 1996 to 2007.

Authors:  Aisling A Clancy; Corina Tiruta; Dianne Ashman; Chad G Ball; Andrew W Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2012-03-13

Review 3.  Definition of hemodynamic stability in blunt trauma patients: a systematic review and assessment amongst Dutch trauma team members.

Authors:  S A I Loggers; T W A Koedam; G F Giannakopoulos; E Vandewalle; M Erwteman; W P Zuidema
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Predictors of transfer from a remote trauma facility to an urban level I trauma center for blunt splenic injuries: a retrospective observational multicenter study.

Authors:  Constance McGraw; Charles W Mains; Jodie Taylor; Cecile D'Huyvetter; Kristin Salottolo; David Bar-Or
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2022-09-09

5.  Non-operative management of blunt abdominal trauma. Is it safe and feasible in a district general hospital?

Authors:  George A Giannopoulos; Iraklis E Katsoulis; Nikolaos E Tzanakis; Panayotis A Patsaouras; Michalis K Digalakis
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.