Literature DB >> 18209138

Predictive factors for success after transnasal endoscopic treatment of choanal atresia.

Natacha Teissier1, Florentia Kaguelidou, Vincent Couloigner, Martine François, Thierry Van Den Abbeele.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the different factors affecting the outcome of transnasal endoscopic repair of choanal atresia (CA) in children.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Academic tertiary care children's hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty patients (48 girls and 32 boys) aged 3 days to 17 years (mean age, 3 years 8 months) who presented with unilateral (n = 53: 37 right, 16 left) or bilateral (n = 27) CA and underwent surgery between September 1996 and December 2005. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent transnasal endoscopic surgery with telescopes and a microdebrider. Nasal tubes in neonates and nasal packing in older children were removed after 48 hours. Systematic endoscopic revision was performed under local or general anesthesia a week after surgery. Patients were then clinically and endoscopically monitored for nasal obstruction and healing for a mean follow-up of 43 months.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients presented with associated malformations: 9 with CHARGE (coloboma, heart disease, choanal atresia, retardation of postnatal growth()and mental development, genital hypoplasia, and ear anomalies), 1 with Treacher-Collins syndrome, 1 with Kabuki syndrome, 1 with facial cleft, 1 with Down syndrome, 12 with nonsyndromic malformations, and 2 with 22q11 microdeletion. Three children had heart malformations not related to CHARGE association. One child had a congenital nasal piriform aperture stenosis. Twenty-four children had undergone previous surgery; 10 underwent a second procedure with success. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was systematically treated in cases of restenosis. Topical mitomycin C was used in 3 patients with relapse. Two patients underwent laser treatment to reduce stenotic scarring. Of the 10 patients who needed revision surgery, 6 had bilateral CA, and 4 had unilateral CA. Age younger than 10 days and presence of GERD increased the chances of restenosis (P = .03). Postoperative stenting negatively affected the outcome. Associated anomalies and previous surgery had no effect on outcome. The bony nature of the CA and bilaterality were not significant (P = .08). However, surgeon learning curve was an important element positively influencing the results (P = .04).
CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal endoscopic repair of CA is a safe and successful technique. Predictive factors of restenosis are the presence of GERD, age younger than 10 days at the time of surgery, and insufficient postoperative endoscopic revision. However, previous surgery and associated malformations are not predictive of a poor surgical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18209138     DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2007.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  14 in total

Review 1.  Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Rainer K Weber; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

2.  Stentless endoscopic repair of congenital choanal atresia: is it enough for maintaining choanal patency?

Authors:  Emel Çadallı Tatar; Bülent Öcal; Esra Doğan; Ömer Bayır; Cem Saka; Ali Özdek; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  New trends in rehabilitation of children with ENT disorders.

Authors:  R Bovo; P Trevisi; E Zanoletti; D Cazzador; T Volo; E Emanuelli; A Martini
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.124

4.  Long-term outcomes of endonasal surgery for choanal atresia: 28 years experience in an academic medical centre.

Authors:  Stylianos Velegrakis; Konstantinos Mantsopoulos; Heinrich Iro; Johannes Zenk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  CT and MRI of congenital nasal lesions in syndromic conditions.

Authors:  Daniel T Ginat; Caroline D Robson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09

6.  Skull Base Anatomy in Patients with Bilateral Choanal Atresia: A Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Christopher Pool; Einat Slonimsky; Roshan Nayak; Lisa Engle; Junjia Zhu; Meghan Wilson
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 7.  Current Updates on Choanal Atresia.

Authors:  Kelvin M Kwong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Retrospective study of a series of choanal atresia patients.

Authors:  Denise Manica; Cláudia Schweiger; Cátia C Saleh Netto; Gabriel Kuhl
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-14

9.  A national study of choanal atresia in tertiary care centers in Canada - part II: clinical management.

Authors:  Josee Paradis; Agnieszka Dzioba; Hamdy El-Hakim; Paul Hong; Frederick K Kozak; Lily H P Nguyen; Demitri Perera; Evan Jon Propst; Jennifer M Siu; Monika Wojtera; Murad Husein
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-07-13

10.  A national study of choanal atresia in tertiary care centers in Canada - part I: clinical presentation.

Authors:  Josee Paradis; Agnieszka Dzioba; Hamdy El-Hakim; Paul Hong; Frederick K Kozak; Lily H P Nguyen; Demitri Perera; Evan Jon Propst; Jennifer M Siu; Monika Wojtera; Murad Husein
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.