Literature DB >> 18208659

Myocardial bridging detection by non-invasive multislice spiral computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.

Ming-hui Wang1, Ai-jun Sun, Ju-ying Qian, Qing-zhi Ling, Meng-su Zeng, Lei Ge, Ke-qiang Wang, Bing Fan, Wei Yan, Feng Zhang, Raimund Erbel, Jun-bo Ge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is current diagnostic standard for myocardial bridging (MB). Non-invasive multislice computerized tomography coronary angiography (MSCT) technique has provided a good anatomical view of the tunnel artery now.
METHODS: A total of 51 consecutive patients with atypical or typical angina scheduled for IVUS were enrolled in this study and MSCT was performed 7 days before IVUS. Coronary imaging was quantified using IVUS and MSCT. Four main vessels (left main artery (LMA), left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA)) were examined.
RESULTS: Forty-one out of 51 (80%) patients received metaprolol (25 mg) before the MSCT scan and 25 of them were current beta-blocker users. The mean heart rate was (64 +/- 3) beats per minute. A total of 51 patients underwent IVUS examination (30 with MB and 21 without MB) were chosen for this study. Twenty-eight out of 30 MB cases were correctly diagnosed by MSCT and 2 patients with MB were not detected. Comparison with IVUS, the sensitivity of detection by MSCT was 93%, specificity was 100%. The lumen diameter of the tunnel artery derived from MSCT and IVUS significantly decreased from (2.9 +/- 0.3) mm to (2.4 +/- 0.4) mm (P < 0.001) and from (3.3 +/- 0.3) mm to (2.6 +/- 0.5) mm (P < 0.001), respectively. Minimal and maximal diameters of MB derived from MSCT were significantly smaller than those from IVUS ((2.4 +/- 0.4) mm vs (2.6 +/- 0.5) mm, P < 0.05 and (2.9 +/- 0.3) mm vs (3.3 +/- 0.3) mm, P < 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MSCT offers a reliable non-invasive method for MB in LAD and atherosclerosis diagnosis with diagnostic accuracy comparable with invasive IVUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18208659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  6 in total

1.  Morphological aspects of myocardial bridges.

Authors:  Almira Lujinović; Amela Kulenović; Eldan Kapur; Refet Gojak
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 2.  Myocardial Bridging: An Up-to-Date Review.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Cheng-Han Chen
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 2.022

3.  Prevalence and predictors of bridging of coronary arteries in a large Indonesian population, as detected by 64-slice computed tomography scan.

Authors:  J Wirianta; M Mouden; J P Ottervanger; J R Timmer; Y B Juwana; M-J de Boer; H Suryapranata
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source CT angiography and coronary risk stratification.

Authors:  Xia Yang; Lu-yue Gai; Ping Li; Yun-dai Chen; Tao Li; Li Yang
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-10-21

5.  A novel stress echocardiography pattern for myocardial bridge with invasive structural and hemodynamic correlation.

Authors:  Shin Lin; Jennifer A Tremmel; Ryotaro Yamada; Ian S Rogers; Celina Mei Yong; Robert Turcott; Michael V McConnell; Rajesh Dash; Ingela Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Cardiovascular consequences of myocardial bridging: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Sorin Hostiuc; Mugurel Constantin Rusu; Mihaela Hostiuc; Ruxandra Irina Negoi; Ionuț Negoi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.