L S Schenkel1, M Marlow-O'Connor, M Moss, J A Sweeney, M N Pavuluri. 1. Center for Cognitive Medicine and the Institute for Juvenile Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. lindsay.schenkel@att.net
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deficits in theory of mind (ToM), or the ability to infer what another person is thinking or feeling, have been reported in manic and euthymic adults with bipolar disorder. To date, there have been no investigations of ToM in pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD). The aim of the current study was to investigate this ability in PBD patients and healthy controls. METHOD: PBD patients (n=26) and intellectually and demographically similar healthy comparison subjects (n=20) were administered two ToM tasks. In the Affective Story Task, subjects were read positive-, negative- and neutral-valenced stories, and were assessed on their ability to recognize that a misleading series of events could lead one character to develop a false belief about another character. On the Hinting Task, subjects were required to infer the real intentions behind subtle hints. RESULTS: The PBD group performed significantly more poorly than controls on the Hinting Task and the positive and negative conditions of the Affective Story Task. In the PBD group only, younger age, earlier illness onset and manic symptoms were associated with poorer ToM performance. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with past findings in adult bipolar disorder (BD), PBD youth performed more poorly than controls on ToM tasks. Data suggest that ToM ability may be more impaired in affectively charged contexts. Additionally, an earlier onset of illness among PBD youth may interfere with the development of social-cognitive skills. ToM disturbances may be a useful treatment target in PBD, with the aim of facilitating more accurate assessment of social cues and better interpersonal functioning.
BACKGROUND: Deficits in theory of mind (ToM), or the ability to infer what another person is thinking or feeling, have been reported in manic and euthymic adults with bipolar disorder. To date, there have been no investigations of ToM in pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD). The aim of the current study was to investigate this ability in PBD patients and healthy controls. METHOD: PBD patients (n=26) and intellectually and demographically similar healthy comparison subjects (n=20) were administered two ToM tasks. In the Affective Story Task, subjects were read positive-, negative- and neutral-valenced stories, and were assessed on their ability to recognize that a misleading series of events could lead one character to develop a false belief about another character. On the Hinting Task, subjects were required to infer the real intentions behind subtle hints. RESULTS: The PBD group performed significantly more poorly than controls on the Hinting Task and the positive and negative conditions of the Affective Story Task. In the PBD group only, younger age, earlier illness onset and manic symptoms were associated with poorer ToM performance. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with past findings in adult bipolar disorder (BD), PBD youth performed more poorly than controls on ToM tasks. Data suggest that ToM ability may be more impaired in affectively charged contexts. Additionally, an earlier onset of illness among PBD youth may interfere with the development of social-cognitive skills. ToM disturbances may be a useful treatment target in PBD, with the aim of facilitating more accurate assessment of social cues and better interpersonal functioning.
Authors: Brendan A Rich; Mariana Schmajuk; Koraly E Perez-Edgar; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-06-13 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: B Geller; K Bolhofner; J L Craney; M Williams; M P DelBello; K Gundersen Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Lindsay S Schenkel; Mani N Pavuluri; Ellen S Herbener; Erin M Harral; John A Sweeney Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Birgit A Völlm; Alexander N W Taylor; Paul Richardson; Rhiannon Corcoran; John Stirling; Shane McKie; John F W Deakin; Rebecca Elliott Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-08-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Rachel H Jacobs; Mani N Pavuluri; Lindsay S Schenkel; Anne Palmer; Khushbu Shah; Deepthi Vemuri; Stefanie Whited; Deborah M Little Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Isabelle E Bauer; Thomas W Frazier; Thomas D Meyer; Eric Youngstrom; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; Jair C Soares Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Christen M Deveney; Melissa A Brotman; Ann Marie Decker; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Nancy E Adleman; Stephen J Fromm; Varun Razdan; Reilly Kayser; Daniel P Dickstein; Melissa A Brotman; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 8.982