Literature DB >> 18208455

A behavioral model for estimating population exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation.

Brian Diffey1.   

Abstract

Determining the variability of solar UV exposure of different members of a population by direct measurement demands high compliance over an extended period of time by a large number of people. An alternative approach is to model the variables that affect personal exposure and this is the basis of the method reported here, which uses a random sampling technique to explore variability of exposure at different times of the year by habitués. It is shown that there are large variations in daily personal erythemal exposure, more so for indoor workers living in northern Europe than those resident in Florida, which are due not only to seasonal changes in ambient, but just as importantly to seasonal variation in behavior. Not surprisingly, holiday and summer weekend exposure account for the largest daily UV doses. Northern Europeans who take their summer vacation in Florida can double their exposure during this period compared with holidaying at home and this illustrates just how important sun protection measures should be during recreational exposure in areas of high insolation if the annual UV burden is to be sensibly controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18208455     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2007.00271.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  6 in total

1.  Human skin pigmentation, migration and disease susceptibility.

Authors:  Nina G Jablonski; George Chaplin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Skin cancer and vitamin D: an update.

Authors:  Candy Wyatt; Rachel E Neale; Robyn M Lucas
Journal:  Melanoma Manag       Date:  2015-02-25

3.  Vitamin D intake needed to maintain target serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in participants with low sun exposure and dark skin pigmentation is substantially higher than current recommendations.

Authors:  Laura M Hall; Michael G Kimlin; Pavel A Aronov; Bruce D Hammock; James R Slusser; Leslie R Woodhouse; Charles B Stephensen
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Predicting ambient ultraviolet from routine meteorological data; its potential use as an instrumental variable for vitamin D status in pregnancy in a longitudinal birth cohort in the UK.

Authors:  Adrian Sayers; Kate Tilling; Barbara J Boucher; Kate Noonan; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Optimal sunscreen use, during a sun holiday with a very high ultraviolet index, allows vitamin D synthesis without sunburn.

Authors:  A R Young; J Narbutt; G I Harrison; K P Lawrence; M Bell; C O'Connor; P Olsen; K Grys; K A Baczynska; M Rogowski-Tylman; H C Wulf; A Lesiak; P A Philipsen
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Individual, environmental, and meteorological predictors of daily personal ultraviolet radiation exposure measurements in a United States cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Khaykin Cahoon; David C Wheeler; Michael G Kimlin; Richard K Kwok; Bruce H Alexander; Mark P Little; Martha S Linet; Daryl Michal Freedman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.