Literature DB >> 18207191

3-year actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience from a tertiary referral center in the United States.

Christian P Pavlovich1, Bruce J Trock, Aaron Sulman, Andrew A Wagner, Lynda Z Mettee, Li-Ming Su.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a prospective analysis of pathological and oncological outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at a medical center in the United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 528 men underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy between April 2001 and August 2005. We excluded 4 open surgical conversions (0.8%) and 16 men (3.0%) without followup. The remaining 508 men had a mean preoperative prostate specific antigen of 6.0 ng/ml (range 0.3 to 27) and Gleason score of 6.3 (range 6 to 10). Stage was cT1b in 1 case (0.2%), cT1c in 350 (68.9%), cT2a in 135 (26.6%), cT2b in 21 (4.1%) and cT2c in 1 (0.2%). Of the patients 89% underwent cavernous nerve preservation. Biochemical recurrence was defined and timed at the first prostate specific antigen of 0.2 ng/ml or greater if at repeat testing it remained 0.2 ng/ml or greater.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 13.2 months (median 12, range 2 to 52). Pathological stage was pT0N0/Nx in 2 men (0.4%), pT2N0/Nx in 414 (81.5%), pT3aN0/Nx in 72 (14.2%), pT3bN0/Nx in 17 (3.3%) and pT2-3N1 in 3 (0.6%). Positive margin rates increased with higher stage (8.2% in pT2 and 39.3% in pT3 cases, p <0.0001). Three-year actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival was 98.2% for pT2N0/Nx and 78.7% for pT3N0/Nx/N1 disease (p <0.0001), and it was 94.5% overall. Multivariate analysis controlling for age, preoperative prostate specific antigen, postoperative Gleason score and stage, and margin status showed that only Gleason score (greater than vs less than 7) and stage (pT3 or any N1 vs pT2) predicted biochemical progression.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can provide excellent cancer control outcomes for clinically localized prostate cancer with high actuarial biochemical recurrence-free survival rates at 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18207191     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  [Radical prostatectomy - pro laparoscopic].

Authors:  H M Do; S Holze; H Qazi; A Dietel; T Häfner; E Liatsikos; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Impact of positive surgical margins on oncological outcome following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP): long-term results.

Authors:  Jonas Busch; Carsten Stephan; Annett Klutzny; Stefan Hinz; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Ergin Kilic; Michael Lein; Steffen Weikert; Kurt Miller; Ahmed Magheli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

Authors:  Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Manoj B Patel; Marcelo A Orvieto; Sanket Chauhan; Vincenzo Ficarra; Sara Melegari; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Fernando P Secin; Angel M Cronin; Darren Katz; Fernando Bianco; Kinjal Vora; Victor Reuter; Andrew J Vickers; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Oncologic outcomes of asian men with clinically localized prostate cancer after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Huai-Ching Tai; Ming-Kuen Lai; Chao-Yuan Huang; Shuo-Meng Wang; Kuo-How Huang; Shiu-Dong Chung; Shih-Chieh Jeff Chueh; Hong-Jeng Yu
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2010-12-19

6.  Location of positive surgical margin and its association with biochemical recurrence rate do not differ significantly in four different types of radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoon Seok Suh; Hyeon Jun Jang; Wan Song; Hye Won Lee; Hye Seung Kim; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Han Yong Choi; Hyun Moo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-11-21

Review 7.  Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Yuefang Jiang; Jun Yuan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Prostate cancer biochemical recurrence rates after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Thomas Nevers; Ilene Staff; Joseph Tortora; Alison Champagne; Stuart S Kesler; Vincent P Laudone; Joseph R Wagner
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Optimising preoperative risk stratification tools for prostate cancer using mpMRI.

Authors:  Lars A R Reisæter; Jurgen J Fütterer; Are Losnegård; Yngve Nygård; Jan Monssen; Karsten Gravdal; Ole J Halvorsen; Lars A Akslen; Martin Biermann; Svein Haukaas; Jarle Rørvik; Christian Beisland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.