Literature DB >> 18206852

Workload assessment in building construction related activities in India.

Rina Maiti1.   

Abstract

A field study was conducted to highlight the occupational risk factors related to building construction activities in India among female workers. These workers were engaged in eight different types of activities and related work parameters were studied in detail. From field environmental parameters, the calculated WBGT was obtained as 30.26+/-1.52 degrees C, indicated that these workers worked under a positive heat load condition. Whole day work study was conducted on 11 adult female workers performing concreting operation. They were having age of 28-32 years with 5-7 years of work experience. These workers were mainly performing two types of operations in the field: (A) asymmetric lifting during concreting a boundary wall formwork of a lift unit and (B) carrying the concrete mixture. During asymmetric lifting, the average field working heart rate (HR) was calculated as 124.1+/-12.5 beats min(-1), equivalent to 45.03+/-6.93% of VO(2) max level. These working heart rates (HRs) were significantly (p<or=0.005) correlated with pause time (P.T.) and lifting frequency, but not with lifting time. A method was proposed to determine the average steady P.T. from fluctuating working HR and the lifting frequency was calculated as 6.1 lifts min(-1). This type of load handling task showed lower work efficiency and higher relative HR (%RHR). The required resting time was calculated as 61.47%, whereas the actual rest time (R.T.) in the field was 23.56+/-10.28%. Using Neibel and Frivalds equation, the rest allowance (RA) due to muscular fatigue and environmental load were calculated as 50.46% and 45.02 min/h, respectively. These results showed that the workers were not getting sufficient rest in the field. With work parameter modification, in optimum condition, the RWL value could be achieved as 7.19 kg, which was much lesser than the actual lifted load of 12.02 kg. Therefore, modification of workplace and work methods was suggested to compensate the health hazard conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18206852     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  6 in total

1.  Practical on-site measurement of heat strain with the use of a perceptual strain index.

Authors:  Albert P C Chan; Y Yang
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  A review on the occupational health and social security of unorganized workers in the construction industry.

Authors:  Guddi Tiwary; P K Gangopadhyay
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2011-01

3.  Comparison of physical workload and physical work capacity among municipality cleaners in Shiraz to determine number of workers needed to counterbalance physical workload.

Authors:  Farnaz Bagherifard; Hadi Daneshmandi; Mansour Ziaei; Haleh Ghaem; Ruhollah Khoshbakht; Omid Jaberi; Alireza Choobineh
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-07

Review 4.  Health impacts of workplace heat exposure: an epidemiological review.

Authors:  Jianjun Xiang; Peng Bi; Dino Pisaniello; Alana Hansen
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Assessment of Heat Stress Exposure among Construction Workers in the Hot Desert Climate of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Bouwarthan; Margaret M Quinn; David Kriebel; David H Wegman
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Effect of Ambient Oxygen Content, Safety Shoe Type, and Lifting Frequency on Subject's MAWL and Physiological Responses.

Authors:  Atef M Ghaleb; Mohamed Z Ramadan; Ahmed Badwelan; Khalid Saad Aljaloud
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.