Literature DB >> 18206786

Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC) against wine microorganisms.

A Costa1, A Barata, M Malfeito-Ferreira, V Loureiro.   

Abstract

Several microbial species associated with wine were challenged against increasing concentrations of dimethyl dicarbonate (DMDC). The concentration inducing complete cell death upon addition to red wine was regarded as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). In dry red wines with 12% (v/v) ethanol and pH 3.50, the inactivation depended on the initial cell concentration. For an initial inoculum of 500 CFU/ml, the MIC of the yeasts species Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Dekkera bruxellensis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia guilliermondii was 100mg/l. The most sensitive strains belong to Zygosaccharomyces bailii, Zygoascus hellenicus and Lachancea thermotolerans, with MIC of 25mg/l DMDC. For inoculation rates of about 10(6)CFU/ml, the maximum dose of DMDC legally authorized (200mg/l) was not effective against the most resistant species. The addition of 100mg/l potassium metabisulphite (PMB), equivalent to 1mg/l molecular sulphur dioxide, increased the inactivation effect of 100mg/l DMDC over initial yeast populations of 10(6)CFU/ml but did not fully kill S. pombe and S. cerevisiae. Lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria were not killed by the addition of 300 mg/l of DMDC. Trials performed in wines before bottling showed that in most samples indigenous bacterial populations were not affected by 200mg/l DMDC. Therefore, under winery practice, DMDC at the maximum dose legally permitted may be regarded as an efficient preservative to control low contamination rates of yeasts but ineffective against lactic acid and acetic acid bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18206786     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  6 in total

1.  Impact of tannin addition on the antioxidant activity and sensory character of Malagousia white wine.

Authors:  Irini F Strati; Panagiotis Tataridis; Adnan Shehadeh; Arhontoula Chatzilazarou; Vasileios Bartzis; Anthimia Batrinou; Vassilia J Sinanoglou
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2021-12-01

2.  Effect of Ethanol, Sulfur Dioxide and Glucose on the Growth of Wine Spoilage Yeasts Using Response Surface Methodology.

Authors:  Mahesh Chandra; Inês Oro; Suzana Ferreira-Dias; Manuel Malfeito-Ferreira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Influence of dimethyl dicarbonate on the resistance of Escherichia coli to a combined UV-Heat treatment in apple juice.

Authors:  Maria Gouma; Elisa Gayán; Javier Raso; Santiago Condón; Ignacio Álvarez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Bacteriophages as an Up-and-Coming Alternative to the Use of Sulfur Dioxide in Winemaking.

Authors:  Gustavo Cordero-Bueso; Javier Moraga; María Ríos-Carrasco; Marina Ruiz-Muñoz; Jesús Manuel Cantoral
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Dimethyl Dicarbonate as a Food Additive Effectively Inhibits Geotrichum citri-aurantii of Citrus.

Authors:  Shuqi Liu; Deyao Zhang; Yuqing Wang; Fan Yang; Juan Zhao; Yujie Du; Zhonghuan Tian; Chaoan Long
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-08-04

6.  Quantifying variation in the ability of yeasts to attract Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Loida Palanca; Anne C Gaskett; Catrin S Günther; Richard D Newcomb; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.