Literature DB >> 18206620

Inflammatory breast carcinoma in magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison with locally advanced breast cancer.

Diane M Renz1, Pascal A T Baltzer, Joachim Böttcher, Fady Thaher, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Oumar Camara, Ingo B Runnebaum, Werner A Kaiser.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: Although inflammatory breast carcinoma (IBC) accounts for 1%-4% of all breast cancer cases, the appearance of this highly malignant tumor in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is still not well characterized. The aim of this study was to identify typical imaging features of IBC in comparison with noninflammatory locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRIs of 48 patients with IBC were compared with an equivalent cohort of 52 subjects with LABC. Age and histopathologic subtype were equivalent between the two groups. To delineate characteristic features, a multitude of dynamic and morphologic parameters were evaluated using T1- and T2-weighted sequences.
RESULTS: No significant differences of prevalences could be found for the following criteria: dynamic tumor signal characteristics, prominent vessels, perifocal edema, axillary lymph node involvement, morphology of focal masses, and morphologic pattern of non-mass like enhancement. Otherwise, the quantity of focal masses and the spatial distribution of the tumoral infiltration significantly differed between the two cancer groups. The following parameters occurred more frequently in the IBC cases: edema (cutaneous/subcutaneous 81.3%, perimamillar 70.8%, diffuse 89.6%, prepectoral 72.9%, intramuscular pectoral 41.7%), thickening (75.0%) and pathologic enhancement (60.4%) of Cooper's ligaments, skin thickening (83.3%), punched-out sign (initially strong, focal increase of some dermal or subcutaneous parts followed by slow-continuous enhancement of the surrounding skin; 56.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory breast carcinoma seems to represent a specific biological entity resulting in typical MRI characteristics. Some of the parameters are supposed to visualize the characteristic extensive lymphovascular infiltration and therefore may improve the diagnosis of IBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18206620     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  6 in total

1.  Inflammatory breast carcinoma and locally advanced breast carcinoma: characterisation with MR imaging.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; F Bonetti; E Manfrin; G Pollini; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Characterizing and eliminating errors in enhancement and subtraction artifacts in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: Chemical shift artifact of the third kind.

Authors:  Jamal J Derakhshan; Elizabeth S McDonald; Evan S Siegelman; Mitchell D Schnall; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Management of Rare Histological Types of Breast Tumours.

Authors:  Toralf Reimer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Current and future applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to breast and ovarian cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jim Klostergaard; Kenia Parga; Raphael G Raptis
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.705

5.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Inflammatory Breast Cancer Prior to and After Neoadjuvant Treatment.

Authors:  Dominique J P van Uden; J Hans W de Wilt; Carla Meeuwis; Charlotte F J M Blanken-Peeters; Ritse M Mann
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance in the detection of breast cancers of different histological types.

Authors:  Rebecca M Mayrhofer; Hsiao Piau Ng; Thomas C Putti; Philip W Kuchel
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-04-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.