Literature DB >> 18206209

Spatial and temporal variability of ribotyping results at a small watershed in South Carolina.

R Heath Kelsey1, Laura F Webster, David J Kenny, Jill R Stewart, Geoffrey I Scott.   

Abstract

The utility of library-based ribotyping methods for a very small study area was evaluated through comparison of local results to libraries with differing spatial and temporal scales. Ribotyping of Escherichia coli isolates was used to evaluate sources of fecal pollution at a coastal golf course in Beaufort County, South Carolina. Thirty-five E. coli isolates were obtained from water samples from a detention pond for testing against several local and regional libraries of known-source isolate patterns. A library of 92 E. coli ribotype patterns was created from wildlife feces obtained on the site. Additional libraries were available for comparison, including a library from Morgan Island, a small, geographically isolated area (including a monkey colony), and a library from ongoing statewide assessments. Seventeen (49%) of the unknown E. coli isolates matched isolates from raccoon and deer scat from the local library. Two isolates (6%) were matched with monkey sources from Morgan Island, and 13 (37%) were matched to raccoon, deer, and cows from the statewide assessment. Evaluation of repeated ribotyping analyses at the study area revealed evidence of temporal variability of potential sources in the local library. Only one of the isolates from the second year of fecal samples successfully matched with a fecal isolate from the previous year. The results from this study suggest that source identification results were variable both spatially and temporally, and that local, temporally specific libraries are most appropriate for library-based MST studies in small watersheds. Results also suggest that it will be difficult to employ adequate sample sizes to satisfactorily address unknown pattern variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18206209     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of animal impacts on bacterial water quality in a South Carolina, USA tidal creek system.

Authors:  L F Webster; D A Graves; D A Eargle; D E Chestnut; J A Gooch; M H Fulton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Identification of fecal input sites in spring water by selection and genotyping of multiresistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Melanie Wicki; Fatma Karabulut; Adrian Auckenthaler; Richard Felleisen; Marcel Tanner; Andreas Baumgartner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.792

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.