OBJECTIVE: To determine whether asking general practitioners to offer chlamydia screening at the same time as Pap screening increases chlamydia screening rates. DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING:Doctors from 31 general practices in the Australian Capital Territory performing more than 15 Pap smear screens per year, and all women aged 16-39 years attending those practitioners between 1 November 2004 and 31 October 2005. INTERVENTION: Doctors in the intervention practices were asked to routinely offer combined chlamydia and Pap screening to eligible women; doctors in the control practices were asked to implement screening guidelines based on a risk assessment of the individual patient (ie, usual practice). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Chlamydia screening rate per visit. RESULTS: There were 26 876 visits by eligible women during the study period: 16 082 to intervention practices and 10 794 to control practices. Chlamydia screening occurred during 6.9% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.3%) of visits to intervention practices and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.9%) of visits to control practices. After controlling for clustering and potential confounders, there were twofold greater odds of chlamydia screening occurring during a visit by an eligible woman to an intervention practice than to a control practice (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.4]). CONCLUSION:Combining chlamydia and Pap screening increases the rate of chlamydia screening in general practice. Implementing this approach would require little additional infrastructure support in settings where a cervical screening program already exists.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether asking general practitioners to offer chlamydia screening at the same time as Pap screening increases chlamydia screening rates. DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Doctors from 31 general practices in the Australian Capital Territory performing more than 15 Pap smear screens per year, and all women aged 16-39 years attending those practitioners between 1 November 2004 and 31 October 2005. INTERVENTION: Doctors in the intervention practices were asked to routinely offer combined chlamydia and Pap screening to eligible women; doctors in the control practices were asked to implement screening guidelines based on a risk assessment of the individual patient (ie, usual practice). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Chlamydia screening rate per visit. RESULTS: There were 26 876 visits by eligible women during the study period: 16 082 to intervention practices and 10 794 to control practices. Chlamydia screening occurred during 6.9% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.3%) of visits to intervention practices and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.1%-4.9%) of visits to control practices. After controlling for clustering and potential confounders, there were twofold greater odds of chlamydia screening occurring during a visit by an eligible woman to an intervention practice than to a control practice (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1 [95% CI, 1.3-3.4]). CONCLUSION: Combining chlamydia and Pap screening increases the rate of chlamydia screening in general practice. Implementing this approach would require little additional infrastructure support in settings where a cervical screening program already exists.
Authors: Michelle S Naimer; Jeffrey C Kwong; Deepit Bhatia; Rahim Moineddin; Michael Whelan; Michael A Campitelli; Liane Macdonald; Aisha Lofters; Ashleigh Tuite; Tali Bogler; Joanne A Permaul; Warren J McIsaac Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jade E Bilardi; Christopher K Fairley; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Marie V Pirotta; Kathleen M McNamee; Siobhan Bourke; Lyle C Gurrin; Margaret Hellard; Lena A Sanci; Michelle J Wills; Jennifer Walker; Marcus Y Chen; Jane S Hocking Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Dyani Lewis; Danielle C Newton; Rebecca J Guy; Hammad Ali; Marcus Y Chen; Christopher K Fairley; Jane S Hocking Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Jane S Hocking; Rhian M Parker; Natasha Pavlin; Christopher K Fairley; Jane M Gunn Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2008-12-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rebecca Lorch; Jane Hocking; Meredith Temple-Smith; Matthew Law; Anna Yeung; Anna Wood; Alaina Vaisey; Basil Donovan; Christopher K Fairley; John Kaldor; Rebecca Guy Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 2.497