Literature DB >> 18205215

Mumps virus reinfection is not a rare event confirmed by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification.

Naoko Yoshida1, Motoko Fujino, Akiko Miyata, Takao Nagai, Makoto Kamada, Hiroshi Sakiyama, Toshiaki Ihara, Takuji Kumagai, Teruo Okafuji, Takao Okafuji, Tetsuo Nakayama.   

Abstract

Clinically apparent mumps reinfection is considered extremely rare, but several cases have been suspected of reinfection in an out-patient clinic. In this study, virological examination, virus isolation, the reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), and IgG and IgM EIA antibodies, were examined in order to identify mumps reinfection. Patients were divided into three categories; the reinfection group comprised 29 patients with a history of natural infection, the vaccine-failure group consisted of 37 patients with an immunization history, and two patients had histories of both immunization and mumps infection. Another 25 patients were enrolled as a primary infection group. Mumps virus was isolated in 5 (17%) and the genome was detected in 12 (41%) of 29 in the reinfection group. Reinfection was confirmed in 21/28, demonstrating high avidity of IgG EIA. Mumps virus was isolated in 15 (41%) and there was a higher positivity of genome amplification in 25 (68%) of 37 patients in the vaccine-failure group. Among these, 23 were confirmed as secondary vaccine failure by high avidity IgG EIA serology. In the primary infection group, the isolation rate and genome detection rate was higher in 16 (64%) and in 18 (72%) of 25 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in virus load among the three groups but high mumps virus load was suspected in the IgM EIA-positive group based on the shorter amplification time on RT-LAMP. Mumps virus reinfection was confirmed by RT-LAMP and an IgG avidity test and was not a rare event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18205215     DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


  15 in total

1.  Estimates of mumps seroprevalence may be influenced by antibody specificity and serologic method.

Authors:  Donald R Latner; Marcia McGrew; Nobia J Williams; Sun B Sowers; William J Bellini; Carole J Hickman
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Enzyme-linked immunospot assay detection of mumps-specific antibody-secreting B cells as an alternative method of laboratory diagnosis.

Authors:  Donald R Latner; Marcia McGrew; Nobia Williams; Luis Lowe; Roniel Werman; Eli Warnock; Kathleen Gallagher; Peter Doyle; Sandra Smole; Susan Lett; Noelle Cocoros; Alfred DeMaria; Raimond Konomi; Cedric J Brown; Paul A Rota; William J Bellini; Carole J Hickman
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 3.  Mumps: an Update on Outbreaks, Vaccine Efficacy, and Genomic Diversity.

Authors:  Eugene Lam; Jennifer B Rosen; Jane R Zucker
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Characterization of large mumps outbreak among vaccinated Palestinian refugees.

Authors:  Musa Y Hindiyeh; Yair Aboudy; Mahmoud Wohoush; Lester M Shulman; Daniela Ram; Tal Levin; Tamar Frank; Flavia Riccardo; Mohamad Khalili; Elias-Shlash Sawalha; Maysoun Obeidi; Guido Sabatinelli; Zehava Grossman; Ella Mendelson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Trisaccharide containing α2,3-linked sialic acid is a receptor for mumps virus.

Authors:  Marie Kubota; Kaoru Takeuchi; Shumpei Watanabe; Shinji Ohno; Rei Matsuoka; Daisuke Kohda; Shin-Ichi Nakakita; Hiroaki Hiramatsu; Yasuo Suzuki; Tetsuo Nakayama; Tohru Terada; Kentaro Shimizu; Nobutaka Shimizu; Mitsunori Shiroishi; Yusuke Yanagi; Takao Hashiguchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mumps complications and effects of mumps vaccination, England and Wales, 2002-2006.

Authors:  Chee Fu Yung; Nick Andrews; Antoaneta Bukasa; Kevin E Brown; Mary Ramsay
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Decreased humoral immunity to mumps in young adults immunized with MMR vaccine in childhood.

Authors:  Mohammed Ata Ur Rasheed; Carole J Hickman; Marcia McGrew; Sun Bae Sowers; Sara Mercader; Amy Hopkins; Vickie Grimes; Tianwei Yu; Jens Wrammert; Mark J Mulligan; William J Bellini; Paul A Rota; Walter A Orenstein; Rafi Ahmed; Srilatha Edupuganti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Antigenic differences between vaccine and circulating wild-type mumps viruses decreases neutralization capacity of vaccine-induced antibodies.

Authors:  M Šantak; M Lang-Balija; J Ivancic-Jelecki; T Košutić-Gulija; S Ljubin-Sternak; D Forcic
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Dynamics of the serologic response in vaccinated and unvaccinated mumps cases during an epidemic.

Authors:  Patricia Kaaijk; Sigrid Gouma; Hinke I Hulscher; Wanda G Han; Deborah E Kleijne; Rob S van Binnendijk; Cécile A van Els
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Remembering mumps.

Authors:  Donald R Latner; Carole J Hickman
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.