Literature DB >> 18205045

Exploring and validating surrogate endpoints in colorectal cancer.

Tomasz Burzykowski1, Marc Buyse, Greg Yothers, Junichi Sakamoto, Dan Sargent.   

Abstract

Sargent et al (J Clin Oncol 23: 8664-8670, 2005) concluded that 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) can be considered a valid surrogate (replacement) endpoint for 5-year overall survival (OS) in clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. We address the question whether the conclusion holds for trials involving other classes of treatments than those considered by Sargent et al. Additionally, we assess if the 3-year cutpoint is an optimal one. To this aim, we investigate whether the results reported by Sargent et al. could have been used to predict treatment effects in three centrally randomized adjuvant colorectal cancer trials performed by the Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment for Cancer (JFMTC) (Sakamoto et al. J Clin Oncol 22:484-492, 2004). Our analysis supports the conclusion of Sargent et al. and shows that using DFS at 2 or 3 years would be the best option for the prediction of OS at 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18205045     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-007-9079-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  5 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  The validation of surrogate endpoints in meta-analyses of randomized experiments.

Authors:  M Buyse; G Molenberghs; T Burzykowski; D Renard; H Geys
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Surrogate threshold effect: an alternative measure for meta-analytic surrogate endpoint validation.

Authors:  Tomasz Burzykowski; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Disease-free survival versus overall survival as a primary end point for adjuvant colon cancer studies: individual patient data from 20,898 patients on 18 randomized trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Harry S Wieand; Daniel G Haller; Richard Gray; Jacqueline K Benedetti; Marc Buyse; Roberto Labianca; Jean Francois Seitz; Christopher J O'Callaghan; Guido Francini; Axel Grothey; Michael O'Connell; Paul J Catalano; Charles D Blanke; David Kerr; Erin Green; Norman Wolmark; Thierry Andre; Richard M Goldberg; Aimery De Gramont
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Efficacy of oral adjuvant therapy after resection of colorectal cancer: 5-year results from three randomized trials.

Authors:  Junichi Sakamoto; Yasuo Ohashi; Chikuma Hamada; Marc Buyse; Tomasz Burzykowski; Pascal Piedbois
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

  5 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate end points--the challenge of statistical validation.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Daniel J Sargent; Axel Grothey; Alastair Matheson; Aimery de Gramont
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Predicting treatment effect from surrogate endpoints and historical trials: an extrapolation involving probabilities of a binary outcome or survival to a specific time.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Daniel J Sargent; Marc Buyse; Tomasz Burzykowski
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Contributions of meta-analyses based on individual patient data to therapeutic progress in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Buyse
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival.

Authors:  Kristine R Broglio; Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  More randomization in phase II trials: necessary but not sufficient.

Authors:  Lawrence Rubinstein; Michael Leblanc; Malcolm A Smith
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Impact of Copula Directional Specification on Multi-Trial Evaluation of Surrogate End Points.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Hongwei Shang; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  Leukemia-free survival as a surrogate end point for overall survival in the evaluation of maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in complete remission.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Stefan Michiels; Pierre Squifflet; Kathryn J Lucchesi; Kristoffer Hellstrand; Mats L Brune; Sylvie Castaigne; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Meta-analysis for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Qian Shi; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Assessment of the consistency and robustness of results from a multicenter trial of remission maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Pierre Squifflet; Kathryn J Lucchesi; Mats L Brune; Sylvie Castaigne; Jacob M Rowe
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Review of meta-analyses evaluating surrogate endpoints for overall survival in oncology.

Authors:  Beth Sherrill; James A Kaye; Rickard Sandin; Joseph C Cappelleri; Connie Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.